爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 381 - 390 of 1006
    2012-爆料网AT-261, Badawi

    爆料网AT addressed the staff member’s appeal seeking reversal of the 爆料网RWA DT judgment with compensation for the actual and moral damage, as well as the reinstatement of her appointment. 爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since there was no need for further clarification of the issues arising from the appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s letter of appointment was clear and unambiguous that the appointment did not carry an expectation of renewal or conversion to any other type of appointment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in finding that the Agency’s extension of the Appellant’s...

    2012-爆料网AT-258, Kananura

    爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the 爆料网DT’s exercise of its jurisdictional powers, conferred on 爆料网DT by its Statute, which enables cases to be judged fairly and expeditiously. 爆料网AT held that the complaints made by the Secretary-General fell squarely within the jurisdiction and competence of 爆料网DT, notwithstanding the alleged breach of procedural fairness. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-250, Rantsiou

    爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request to have all appeal-related documents removed from her 爆料网RWA official service file. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding no irregularity in the decision-making process under judicial review and consequently dismissing the application. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had to persuade it that there were flaws in the contested administrative decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment, the proceedings that led to it, or in the 爆料网RWA DT’s judgment, which would warrant vacating the judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not raised new arguments...

    2012-爆料网AT-231, Ortiz

    爆料网AT noted that, in considering an appeal filed by a former ICAO staff member, it was reviewing a decision taken by an executive authority (i. e. ICAO Secretary-General) on the basis of the conclusions and recommendations of the AJAB, and not a judgment delivered by a professional, independent court of first instance determining the issue itself through its decision, i. e., 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that to that extent, the 爆料网AT Statute is only applicable to such an appeal insofar as, and on condition that its provisions are compatible with the judgment of an appeal directed against a decision taken by...

    2012-爆料网AT-217, Rahimi

    In her appeal, the Appellant contended that the Organisation owed her a duty of care as a result of the actions of its representatives. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not produce any evidence that the invoked injury was the result of negligence or fraud caused by a specific act or omission of the 爆料网 or one of its representatives, or of the fact that the Organisation was aware of the fraud prior to the Appellant’s allegations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claim for damages could not be entertained as there was no nexus between the fraud and the 爆料网, nor was the Organisation aware of the...

    2013-爆料网AT-390, Wesslund

    爆料网AT considered a writ of mandamus from Ms Wesslund, who requested that 爆料网AT order 爆料网DT to accept her applications. 爆料网AT held that because it did not have inherent or original jurisdiction outside its capacity as an appellate body, it considered the motion for writ of mandamus to be an appeal against 爆料网DT Order No. 100 (NY/2013). 爆料网AT held that the appeal was received beyond the deadline for appeal. Noting that Ms Wesslund did not apply to 爆料网AT for an extension or waive of the applicable time limits, 爆料网AT held that the appeal of the Order was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT dismissed the...

    2013-爆料网AT-317, El Khatib

    爆料网AT considered Mr El Khatib’s application for revision of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-142. 爆料网AT held that Mr El Khatib did not identify any fact unknown at the time of the impugned judgment which could justify its review. 爆料网AT held that what he actually sought was a discussion of the amount of compensation awarded to him, an option not granted by the Statute. 爆料网AT held that the petition did not meet the statutory requirements. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.

    2013-爆料网AT-387, Gakumba

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the matter of compensation. 爆料网AT held that the appeal had to be allowed in part because 爆料网DT erred in setting the compensation in lieu of reinstatement at two years’ net base salary without considering that Mr Gakumba’s previous fixed-term appointments were one year each. 爆料网AT held that the expectancy of renewal could not be fixed beyond such a period and therefore reduced the compensation to one year’s net base salary. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment on compensation for non-pecuniary damages and held that no error of law was...