±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-±¬ÁÏÍøAT-154. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the new evidence was irrelevant because the case was not receivable; neither ±¬ÁÏÍøDT nor ±¬ÁÏÍøAT had jurisdiction to hear Mr. Sims¡¯ case. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT denied the application.