爆料网

Article 2.1

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 159
    2024-爆料网AT-1477, Sandi Arnold

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the staff member’s action of gifting a sex toy to a subordinate was inappropriate, as it transgressed the boundary between the professional and personal life of the subordinate, even if the event took place in private. Whether solicited or not, it had the potential to negatively impact the image and interests of the Organization. Consequently, the 爆料网AT concluded that by doing so, the staff member failed to uphold the required standard expected of her role as a manager.

    The 爆料网AT also found that the 爆料网DT committed no error in finding that...

    2024-爆料网AT-1506, Amjad Al-Thaher

    The 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s determination of the former staff member’s chances of selection for the position at one-fourth on alternative grounds. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT appropriately considered the possibility that the Agency could have introduced additional candidates on an equivalency basis during a second review after the shortlisting phase. In particular, the 爆料网RWA DT held that, since the sufficient number of candidates for a competitive exercise was normally between three to five candidates per vacancy, it was reasonable to expect that the Agency would have brought more...

    2024-爆料网AT-1492, Alain Bertrand Kamdem Souop

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the staff member’s application was not receivable because he failed to request management evaluation of the contested decision within the 60-day statutory time limit. The 爆料网AT determined that, since the staff member was notified on 27 and 28 April 2022 of the rejection of his request for medical evaluation, he had 60 days from that date to submit his request for management evaluation. However, he only submitted his request to the Management Evaluation Unit on 3 November 2022, and later to the United Nations Development Programme (爆料网DP) on...

    爆料网DT/2024/054, Raschdorf

    For an application to be considered receivable by the Tribunal, it is essential that the Applicant distinctly identifies the specific administrative decision being contested. This requirement is stipulated under art. 2.1 of the Tribunal’s Statute, which outlines the parameters within which the Tribunal exercises its jurisdiction. The clarity in pinpointing the contested decision ensures that there is a concrete basis for the Tribunal to examine the claims and assess any alleged violations of employment terms.

    Under the circumstances, the Tribunal finds that it is hamstrung by the lack of...

    2024-爆料网AT-1476, Simone Monasebian

    At the outset, the Appeals Tribunal noted that Ms. Monasebian had provided little or no reason in support of her request for the anonymization of the Judgment other than a general statement that the information in her case was sensitive. The Appeals Tribunal took the view that anonymization was not warranted in this case and dismissed her request.

    The Appeals Tribunal was satisfied that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that there was a preponderance of the evidence that Ms. Monasebian had engaged in a pattern of conduct through which she created an intimidating, hostile and/or offensive work...

    2024-爆料网AT-1459, Curt Hampstead

    The Appeals Tribunal found that Mr. Hampstead had not established that the 爆料网DT made any errors under Article 2(1) of the Appeals Tribunal Statute.

    The 爆料网DT correctly took note of the documented performance shortcomings over three performance cycles as well as the fact that Mr. Hampstead’s performance did not improve despite the remedial measures put in place, such as two PIPs, the adjustment of output timelines, and continuous feedback, performance discussions and training that Mr. Hampstead had received over the years.The 爆料网DT also correctly held that the Administration had followed...

    2024-爆料网AT-1446, Ashok Kumar Nigam

    The 爆料网AT held that, since Mr. Nigam based his interlocutory appeal on alleged errors of fact and law by the 爆料网DT Judge President, with no allegation of the 爆料网DT acting extra-jurisdictionally or similarly in excess of its jurisdiction, he must wait to exercise his right of appeal until a final decision has been made.

    The 爆料网AT concluded that an earlier 爆料网DT Judgment contained neither any indication of bias by Judge Belle against Mr. Nigam, nor any criticism beyond what a reasonably informed observer might expect from a partly erroneous judgment and its subsequent appellate review.

    The 爆料网AT...

    2024-爆料网AT-1443, Ahmad Shukri Safi

    The 爆料网AT held that Mr. Safi failed to discharge his burden in identifying in what respect and for what reasons the 爆料网RWA DT erred in its Judgment. Mr. Safi merely reiterated the same arguments that he had presented in his application to the 爆料网RWA DT. The 爆料网AT stated that it is not its role to reexamine the staff member’s case anew, and accordingly, his appeal must fail. The 爆料网AT also observed that the 爆料网RWA DT drew reasonable inferences from its extensive fact-finding exercise and delivered a well-reasoned judgment.

    The appeal was dismissed, and Judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2023/011 was...

    2024-爆料网AT-1444, Yelena Goldenberg

    The 爆料网AT held that the Administration did not act unreasonably or unlawfully in requiring the staff member to work from the office two days per week. It further held that relevant considerations, including the staff member’s personal and medical circumstances, were taken into consideration, and irrelevant considerations were excluded. The 爆料网AT also found that there was no obligation on the Administration to establish that the requested accommodations represented a disproportionate or undue burden on the workplace.

    The 爆料网AT also found no merit in the staff member’s argument that the lack of...

    2024-爆料网AT-1409, Lillian Ular

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member failed to provide evidence to prove entitlement to compensation for harm suffered. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that no evidence was submitted proving a nexus between the illegality committed and any harm suffered by the former staff member as a result. The 爆料网AT highlighted that the medical report submitted by the former staff member recorded that she had complained of lack of sleep and headaches “for several years” and that such symptoms were consistent with a previous diagnosed medical condition.

    As to the costs of the appeal, since there was no...