爆料网

Article 9.1(a)

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 23
    2024-爆料网AT-1409, Lillian Ular

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member failed to provide evidence to prove entitlement to compensation for harm suffered. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that no evidence was submitted proving a nexus between the illegality committed and any harm suffered by the former staff member as a result. The 爆料网AT highlighted that the medical report submitted by the former staff member recorded that she had complained of lack of sleep and headaches “for several years” and that such symptoms were consistent with a previous diagnosed medical condition.

    As to the costs of the appeal, since there was no...

    2023-爆料网AT-1405, Yonas Negasa

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General.

    The 爆料网AT held that the administration of the written security affairs exam in the present case had not met the minimum standards detailed in Chhikara. The 爆料网AT noted that the Administration had first administered the test, analyzed the results, and only then had decided that certain questions should be eliminated from consideration. The 爆料网AT found that the unannounced and ex post deletion of questions from the written examination, after it had already been marked, on its very face violated the obligation to administer the test in a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1404 , Alan George Blythe

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member.

    The 爆料网AT found that the recommendation report did not provide any explanation to understand the rationale of the non-selection decision. The 爆料网AT noted that no information had been given in the course of the judicial proceedings either as to why the external candidate was the most suitable candidate. The 爆料网AT held that, for the sake of reasonableness, fairness and transparency, it was expected from the Administration to give relevant and true reasons supporting its ultimate choice. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT had made an error of fact...

    2022-爆料网AT-1217, Ajay Sud

    爆料网AT disagreed. First, the Tribunal reasoned that the JAB did not engage in a critical analysis of the facts of the case and did not apply the law to the facts in order to ascertain whether the exercise of discretion was lawful. 爆料网AT concluded that the JAB Decision was arbitrary and did not meet the minimum requirements of providing a reasoned analysis. Second, on the merits, 爆料网AT found the Administration did not notify the staff member of his shortcomings in sufficient time. Neither did It provide the staff member with explicit measures against which his performance would be evaluated. Third...

    2022-爆料网AT-1207, Michelle Rockcliffe

    爆料网AT disagreed and found the background of the prior retaliation against the Staff Member affects the principle of the presumption of regularity. In light of the circumstances of this particular case, 爆料网AT found the Administration bore the obligation to justify the lawfulness of its decision to cancel the Job Opening. 爆料网AT thus found the 爆料网DT erred by not requiring the Administration to establish its justification in law for the cancellation of the Job Opening. The administrative decision to cancel the Job Opening was rescinded, and the Tribunal set in lieu compensation at two years’ net base...

    2019-爆料网AT-927, Jafari

    爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the legal framework did not establish an automatic right of the staff member to the extension of his or her service beyond the age of retirement upon the submission of the pertinent application, even if she or he satisfied those two conditions. However, 爆料网AT held that, contrary to 爆料网RWA DT’s finding, the Administration has the discretion to deny a request to extend a staff member’s service beyond retirement only in exceptional cases and on account of the interests of 爆料网RWA, which must be reflected clearly and precisely in the reasoning for the decision. 爆料网AT held...

    2011-爆料网AT-176, Dzintars

    Although the Administration failed to take into account the Applicant’s upgraded performance appraisal, 爆料网AT held that this would make no difference to the outcome of the appeal because a staff member who has received two consecutive ratings of partially meets performance expectations has no legitimate expectation of renewal of contract at the end of the contract period. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral damages caused by the denial of his due process rights, payable under Article 9(1)(b) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal in part, modifying the 爆料网DT...

    2013-爆料网AT-387, Gakumba

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the matter of compensation. 爆料网AT held that the appeal had to be allowed in part because 爆料网DT erred in setting the compensation in lieu of reinstatement at two years’ net base salary without considering that Mr Gakumba’s previous fixed-term appointments were one year each. 爆料网AT held that the expectancy of renewal could not be fixed beyond such a period and therefore reduced the compensation to one year’s net base salary. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment on compensation for non-pecuniary damages and held that no error of law was...

    2013-爆料网AT-359, Ademagic et al. and McIlwraith

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal Ademagic et al. 爆料网AT held that judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 爆料网DT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal on that issue; 爆料网AT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...

    2013-爆料网AT-358, Longone

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal by Mr. Longone. 爆料网AT held that judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members was vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 爆料网DT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal on that issue; 爆料网AT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...