爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the time limit for filing an appeal may be suspended, waived, or extended, only in exceptional cases and upon a written request by an appellant prior to the filing of an appeal, which the Appellant failed to submit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee did not err in holding the application was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT noted that, in refusing to receive the application, the Standing Committee also implicitly refused to find “good cause” to waive the sixty days’ time limit for review set forth in Section K of the 爆料网JSPF Administrative Rules. 爆料网AT also found no error in this implicit determination and held that a waiver of five years for review by the Standing Committee would be unreasonable, especially in light of the time limits in the Transfer Agreement between 爆料网JSPF and CTBTO. 爆料网AT...
On receivability, 爆料网AT held that the appeal was receivable insofar as it related to the 爆料网JSPF decision to deduct child support from the Appellant’s pension in accordance with Article 45 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. As to the appeal related to repayment of a sum paid directly to the Appellant’s estranged spouse as child’s benefit under Article 36 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, 爆料网AT held that this aspect was not receivable for failure to challenge in a timely manner the decision and that his claim regarding due process with respect to direct payments under Article 36 had no merit. On the merits of...
