爆料网

Article 18.1

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 1 - 6 of 6
    2023-爆料网AT-1395, Abdurrahman Turk

    The 爆料网AT declined Mr. Turk’s request for an oral hearing, and found no error in the 爆料网DT’s decision not to order the production of additional documents.

    The 爆料网AT reaffirmed the legal framework which provides that staff members have no legitimate expectation of any renewal of their fixed-term appointments. The 爆料网AT also confirmed that the Tribunals will not interfere with the Organization’s discretion in restructuring decisions, and that the Tribunals have no authority to review General Assembly decisions related to administrative and budgetary matters. In this case, the 爆料网AT held that the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1379, Leopold Camille Yodjeu Ntemde

    The 爆料网AT considered three appeals by the applicant.

    The 爆料网AT found that the impugned Order was an interlocutory order and was obviously beyond the competence of the 爆料网AT.

    The 爆料网AT held that the applicant had not submitted documents to prove being a United Nations staff member and that he had no legal standing before the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT noted that there was no evidence of an offer of appointment having been issued to him for either post. Second, he failed to complete the pre-recruitment formalities for both posts. Third, he failed to confirm, within a reasonable time, his interest and...

    2015-爆料网AT-550, Mizyed

    爆料网AT held that the evidence against the Appellant uncovered by the investigation was so overwhelming that the only reasonable conclusion available to 爆料网DT was that the facts were established by clear and convincing evidence. Noting that the evidence that he was in possession of the stolen card and that he used it to refuel his own private vehicle was not contested by the Appellant, 爆料网AT held that his explanation of how he came into possession of the stolen card and how he came to use it was incapable of belief. 爆料网AT agreed with the finding of 爆料网DT that the established facts amounted to serious...

    2018-爆料网AT-816, Harris

    爆料网AT denied the request for an oral hearing since the factual and legal issues of the appeal were clearly defined. 爆料网AT rejected to annex a medical report as evidence since the Appellant had not filed a motion, finding that the admission of documents was not in the interest of justice and the efficient and expeditious resolution of the proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable ratione materiae, considering that the 爆料网DT Statute, in unequivocal terms, provides that the decision of 爆料网DT on an application for suspension of action shall not be subject to appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1054, Ross

    On the Applicant’s claim that 爆料网DT committed an error of procedure by not allowing him to submit an affidavit from his former supervisor, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly exercised its broad discretion under Article 18(1) of its Rules of Procedure in determining the admissibility as well as the evidentiary value and weight of the proffered affidavit. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusions were consistent with the evidence. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the burden of proof for demonstrating an error in the judgment such as to warrant its reversal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1024, Nyawa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Nyawa committed the disciplinary offenses attributed to him. 爆料网AT held that the established facts amounted to misconduct on the part of Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT disagreed with 爆料网DT that a written censure was subsumed by the sanction of deferment for eligibility for promotion, however, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s holding that the deferment for eligibility for promotion was sufficient sanction was not a manifestly unreasonable decision warranting 爆料网AT intervention...