爆料网

Article 2

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 26
    591 (2025), Jonathan Hall; Khalilah Hackman; Giovanni Ardito
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT noted with concern that the JAB had been dismantled temporarily without prior warning given to ISA staff members and with no reasons provided by the Administration; it was also alarming that the Administration had dismantled the JAB with no successor in place, denying the staff members access to justice in the interim. The 爆料网AT found that there were no judgments or decisions from the JAB against which the 爆料网AT could evaluate the requested relief. The 爆料网AT held that the motions had become moot as the JAB had since been reconstituted and a panel to consider the requests for suspension...

    2024-爆料网AT-1449, Michael David Antoine

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member publicly engaged in acts of a sexual nature in a clearly marked United Nations vehicle, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT had before it a video clip depicting the actions in question, which were clearly of a sexual nature.

    The 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT that the lawfulness of the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1448, Ray Steven Millan

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member allowed an unauthorized female individual to board a United Nations vehicle assigned to him and to publicly commit acts of a sexual nature in the rear seat, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT appropriately considered the former staff member's admissions, as well as the video clip...

    2022-爆料网AT-1309, Emma Reilly

    爆料网AT endorsed the 爆料网DT’s holding that the decision to issue a press release in response to allegations that OHCHR had endangered the lives of Chinese human rights defenders who attended the Human Rights Council in Geneva in March 2013 fell within the discretion of the Organization and was a managerial prerogative. 爆料网AT found that the specific part of it which concerned the issue of the provision of names of Chinese human rights activists to the Chinese government fell outside the scope of its judicial review due to the general nature of its content and to the fact that it embodied a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1370, AAC

    After requesting additional findings of fact from the 爆料网DT, the 爆料网AT reconsidered an appeal by the staff member following the prior remand.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT’s judgment had failed to make a single mention of the nature, content or purpose of the testimony adduced under oath before it but was based entirely on hearsay evidence drawn exclusively from the investigation report and other documents. The 爆料网AT found problematic the fact that the 爆料网DT made no pronouncement as to why it exclusively relied on hearsay evidence and gave no reason why the evidence was not given by the person...

    2022-爆料网AT-1291, Korkut Yavuz

    爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the Administration’s decision not to set up a fact-finding investigation panel against Mr. Yavuz’s FRO and SRO was lawful, as the incidents described in Mr. Yavuz’s complaint did not provide sufficient grounds they had engaged in prohibited conduct (harassment, abuse of authority) but fell in the realm of workplace disagreements. 爆料网AT found that Mr. Yavuz did not show that the incidents mentioned in his complaint with regard to the conduct of his FRO and SRO were in any way motivated by any of the characteristics or traits (or similar) listed in Section 1...

    2023-爆料网AT-1361, AAO

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT judgment was problematic because the 爆料网DT's findings seemed to be based entirely on hearsay evidence, i.e., the findings in the OIOS investigation report. The 爆料网AT observed that the 爆料网DT judgment failed to explain the evidentiary basis of its conclusion that sexual harassment was highly probable, and made no explicit or precise findings in relation to the evidence given under oath at the hearing. The failure of the 爆料网DT to make findings about the testimony it heard made the appeal well-nigh impossible. The 爆料网AT noted that there was no transcript of the hearing, and...

    2022-爆料网AT-1282, Olexandr Maruschak

    As to the appeal against the 爆料网DT’s Order for expungement of the impugned documents from its case file, 爆料网AT found that it was receivable because, unless the documents were preserved for use at trial, they might be lost with the consequence that the Secretary-General would be unable to use them to establish his allegations of forgery and fraud as he was entitled to. 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT’s Order was, in this respect, effectively irremediable; that this would be a manifestly unreasonable consequence of the Order for the Secretary-General; and that the circumstances were so rare and...

    2022-爆料网AT-1220, Dzenan Viteskic

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err when it held that ST/AI/2017 was the governing legal framework applicable to the case. 爆料网AT held that joint representation by 爆料网-Women, where the Appellant currently served, and 爆料网MIK, where the events in dispute occurred, was justified. 爆料网AT held that the circumstances also justified the granting of an opportunity to supplement the initial reply (and a corresponding right to reply). 爆料网AT held that, given that the Appellant had not contested the joint representation before 爆料网DT at the time and having been afforded the opportunity to answer the supplementary...

    2022-爆料网AT-1231, Sergio Arvizu Trevino

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had no standing to seek consideration by a full bench. 爆料网AT held that to the extent 爆料网DT engaged in a fact-finding exercise of its own, this was not a legitimate exercise of its competence. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s failure to provide adequate reasons for the contested decision resulted in the contested decision being unlawful. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s failure to exercise its discretion with regard to carrying out an investigation also rendered the contested decision unlawful. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal in part. 爆料网AT vacated the 爆料网DT Judgment by...