2011-��AT-144

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable. ��AT held that the time limit for filing an appeal may be suspended, waived, or extended, only in exceptional cases and upon a written request by an appellant prior to the filing of an appeal, which the Appellant failed to submit. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his contract for unsatisfactory service and not to provide him with a lump-sum payment for his repatriation travel. ��DT found that the claim relating to the non-renewal decision was not receivable. Based on an offer made by the Secretary-General, ��DT ordered ICTR to provide him with tickets or an amount equal thereto for travel and shipment.

Legal Principle(s)

A written application to ��AT for suspension, waiver, or extension of time limit by an appellant must be submitted prior to the filing of an appeal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Thiam

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement