爆料网

ICTR

Showing 1 - 10 of 64
2010-爆料网AT-091, Abdallah

爆料网AT held that the Appellant was unable to show any illegality of fact, procedure or law in the 爆料网DT judgment which might have compelled it to decide in his favour. 爆料网AT held that to report to work on time, regularly, and without break is a basic duty of anyone who is employed. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was given a fair hearing before 爆料网DT and the reasons for 爆料网DT dismissing his appeal were valid. 爆料网AT held that the decision not to renew the Appellant’s contract was validly taken and called for no interference. 爆料网AT rejected the appeal.

2010-爆料网AT-079, Sethia

爆料网AT held that the repeated requests by the Appellant to the management over a period of seven years for a correction of his entry-level were mere restatements of the original claim and did not stop the deadline for contesting the decision from running. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not have the power to waive or suspend the deadline for requesting administrative review under the old internal justice system (Costa (2010-爆料网AT-036)). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in applying the decision in Rosca (爆料网DT/2009/052), which was disproved by 爆料网AT in Costa, but that the error did not affect the outcome...

2010-爆料网AT-055, Hijaz

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s decision on an Appellant’s request to suspend, waive or extend deadlines is not a judgment made in respect of an appeal against an administrative decision, within the meaning of Article 2 of the 爆料网AT Statute, since no appeal had yet been filed. 爆料网AT held, therefore, that 爆料网DT’s decision on the Appellant’s request of extension could not be appealed. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2010-爆料网AT-008, Onana

The Secretary-General appealed, asserting that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence in ordering suspension of the decision not to renew Mr Onana’s appointment until it determined the substantive application on its merits. 爆料网AT noted the exclusion of the right to appeal a decision to suspend the execution of an administrative decision constitutes an exception to the general principle of the right to appeal and must therefore be narrowly interpreted; this exception only applies to jurisdictional decisions ordering the suspension of an administrative decision pending a management evaluation. 爆料网AT...

2011-爆料网AT-157, Onana

爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable because it was not filed within the deadline. 爆料网AT held that there were no exceptional circumstances for it to waive the time limits. 爆料网AT was not persuaded that the Appellant did not receive the 爆料网DT judgment or any notification of the judgment, as he had actual knowledge of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s right to due process of law was not violated. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable as it was time-barred. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2011-爆料网AT-144, Thiam

爆料网AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the time limit for filing an appeal may be suspended, waived, or extended, only in exceptional cases and upon a written request by an appellant prior to the filing of an appeal, which the Appellant failed to submit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2011-爆料网AT-132, Frechon

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that Ms Frechon was incapable of further service, based on the findings of the Medical Board, was not tantamount to 爆料网DT having stepped into the shoes of the 爆料网 Medical Director. 爆料网AT held that there were no grounds to disagree with the finding of 爆料网DT that Ms Frechon’s contract was, in fact, terminated for medical reasons. 爆料网AT held that the procedure which should have been invoked was that set out in ST/AI/1999/16. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in rescinding the decision to...

2012-爆料网AT-223, Rawat

爆料网AT considered the appeal, in which the Secretary-General requested that 爆料网AT consider the appeal receivable and find that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence in ordering a suspension of action on the decision not to extend Mr Rawat’s appointment. 爆料网AT noted that, in imminently executing the administrative order, 爆料网DT failed to comply with the five-working-day limit, set forth in Villamoran (2011-爆料网AT-160), without giving any reasons for doing so and thus, clearly exceeded its competence. 爆料网AT consequently held that the appeal against the contested order was receivable and founded. 爆料网AT rescinded...

2012-爆料网AT-218, Christensen

As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing as the submissions by the parties did not require clarification. 爆料网AT questioned whether her case presented exceptional circumstances that would warrant the reopening of her case by the Secretary-General, as her application was not filed in a timely manner. 爆料网AT found that the appeal was not receivable as, notwithstanding her illness, she did not demonstrate such circumstances. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网DT judgment.

2013-爆料网AT-377, Balinge

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on questions of fact by ignoring or failing to examine what the Appellant considered to be evidence, which constituted mere allegations and unsubstantiated argumentation on his part. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not support his submission by any grounds which would bring the issue within the remit of 爆料网AT. Noting that the Appellant relied upon the statements and observations which he had brought before 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT noted that a litigant’s past allegations and arguments cannot be considered evidence per se. 爆料网AT held that it was not the task of 爆料网DT (or 爆料网AT)...