2011-��AT-157

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the appeal was not receivable because it was not filed within the deadline. ��AT held that there were no exceptional circumstances for it to waive the time limits. ��AT was not persuaded that the Appellant did not receive the ��DT judgment or any notification of the judgment, as he had actual knowledge of the judgment. ��AT held that the Appellant��s right to due process of law was not violated. ��AT held that the appeal was not receivable as it was time-barred. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the non-renewal of his contract. ��DT rejected the application.

Legal Principle(s)

An appeal that is not filed within the time limits will not be receivable by ��AT in the absence of exceptional circumstances.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Onana

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement