2010-��AT-091

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the Appellant was unable to show any illegality of fact, procedure or law in the ��DT judgment which might have compelled it to decide in his favour. ��AT held that to report to work on time, regularly, and without break is a basic duty of anyone who is employed. ��AT held that the Appellant was given a fair hearing before ��DT and the reasons for ��DT dismissing his appeal were valid. ��AT held that the decision not to renew the Appellant��s contract was validly taken and called for no interference. ��AT rejected the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his contract on the basis of chronic absenteeism. ��DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Abdallah

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement