2011-��AT-176

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

Although the Administration failed to take into account the Applicant��s upgraded performance appraisal, ��AT held that this would make no difference to the outcome of the appeal because a staff member who has received two consecutive ratings of partially meets performance expectations has no legitimate expectation of renewal of contract at the end of the contract period. ��AT held that the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral damages caused by the denial of his due process rights, payable under Article 9(1)(b) of the ��AT Statute. ��AT allowed the appeal in part, modifying the ��DT judgment by awarding the Appellant compensation in the amount of two months�� net base pay, plus interest, under Article 9(1)(b) of the ��AT Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the non-renewal of his appointment, which failed to take into account his upgraded performance rating following a rebuttal process. ��DT rejected the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Dzintars

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement