2013-��AT-317

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered Mr El Khatib��s application for revision of judgment No. 2011-��AT-142. ��AT held that Mr El Khatib did not identify any fact unknown at the time of the impugned judgment which could justify its review. ��AT held that what he actually sought was a discussion of the amount of compensation awarded to him, an option not granted by the Statute. ��AT held that the petition did not meet the statutory requirements. ��AT dismissed the application for revision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr El Khatib had contested the abolition of his post and the delay in payment of salary increments. On appeal, ��AT held that he had not been properly treated and awarded compensation in the amount of three months�� net base salary.

Legal Principle(s)

Any application which seeks review of a final judgment rendered by ��AT can only succeed if it fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established by Article 11 of the ��AT Statute.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Outcome Extra Text

Only financial compensation; Only financial compensation.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

El Khatib

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement