爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-015 by Ms. Macharia. 爆料网AT held that Ms. Macharia provided no evidence upon which it could infer that there was bias or likelihood of bias on the part of Judge Izuako. 爆料网AT held that, with regard to the Legal Officer who allegedly had a personal friendship with Judge Boolell, there was no evidence for it to draw the conclusion that the Legal Officer influenced the proceedings or the 爆料网DT Judge in her decision. 爆料网AT held that Ms. Macharia did not offer any evidence in support of her bare assertions casting serious doubt on the integrity of both Judges Boolell and Izuako. 爆料网AT dismissed the application.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-015, 爆料网AT dismissed Ms Macharia’s appeal.
Legal Principle(s)
The minimum standards of fair decision-making by all adjudicating bodies include the entitlement to an unbiased decision-maker. A conjecture may be plausible but is of no legal value, for its essence is that it is a mere guess.