爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and found that she did not demonstrate that her request for an extension of time was reasonable. 爆料网AT found that the evidence about negotiations being contemplated, needed, or underway was previously refuted on appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had the time and the assistance of legal counsel to advance her application and did not avail herself of those opportunities. 爆料网AT accordingly dismissed the appeal.
爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-015 by Ms. Macharia. 爆料网AT held that Ms. Macharia provided no evidence upon which it could infer that there was bias or likelihood of bias on the part of Judge Izuako. 爆料网AT held that, with regard to the Legal Officer who allegedly had a personal friendship with Judge Boolell, there was no evidence for it to draw the conclusion that the Legal Officer influenced the proceedings or the 爆料网DT Judge in her decision. 爆料网AT held that Ms. Macharia did not offer any evidence in support of her bare assertions casting serious doubt on the...
