爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered Ms Beaudry’s application for revision of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-129. 爆料网AT held that Ms Beaudry’s arguments were irrelevant if they did not meet the requirements clearly established in the 爆料网AT Statute to ensure the finality of a judgment. 爆料网AT held that the application did not meet the requirements of Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute and therefore was manifestly inadmissible. 爆料网AT dismissed the application.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-129, 爆料网AT vacated 爆料网DT judgment No. 爆料网DT/2010/039 and affirmed the Administration’s decision not to renew Ms Beaudry’s appointment of limited duration.
Legal Principle(s)
An application that, in fact, seeks a review of a final 爆料网AT judgment can irrespective of its title, only succeed if it fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established under Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute. Parties cannot rely on 爆料网AT’s inherent power to reconsider to obtain a revision expressly forbidden by its Statute from a rule based on the concept of res judicata.