爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT referenced the Shanks jurisprudence (judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-026bis) where it held that the authority of a final judgment - res judicata - cannot be so readily set aside. 爆料网AT noted that there are only limited grounds as enumerated in Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute for review of a final judgment and an allegation of an error in law is not one of them. 爆料网AT dismissed the application to set aside and remand the previous judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Previous judgment: The Applicant filed an application to set aside a previous judgment, holding that her case was time-barred, and have the case remanded to 爆料网DT. She claimed that this error could lead to a miscarriage of justice. The Secretary-General submitted that there were no grounds for 爆料网AT to review the application and requested its dismissal.
Legal Principle(s)
The authority of a final judgment - res judicata - cannot be so readily set aside. There are only limited grounds as enumerated in Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute for review of a final judgment. An allegation of an error in law is not one of them.