爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-084 filed by the estate of Mr Sanwidi. 爆料网AT held that the estate of Mr Sandwidi did not present new evidence but merely expressed disagreement with the judgment. 爆料网AT denied the application for revision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-084, 爆料网AT overturned 爆料网DT’s finding that the disciplinary measure imposed upon Mr Sanwidi was disproportionate to his conduct. 爆料网AT concluded that, by entering into a currency exchange transaction with a vendor of MONUC, Mr Sanwidi failed to meet the standards expected of a staff member involved in procurement, his misconduct was serious, and the disciplinary measure of summary dismissal was not disproportionate. 爆料网AT affirmed the decision to summarily dismiss him.
Legal Principle(s)
The review procedure is of a corrective nature and thus is not an opportunity for a party to reargue his or her case.