爆料网

2012-爆料网AT-258

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the 爆料网DT’s exercise of its jurisdictional powers, conferred on 爆料网DT by its Statute, which enables cases to be judged fairly and expeditiously. 爆料网AT held that the complaints made by the Secretary-General fell squarely within the jurisdiction and competence of 爆料网DT, notwithstanding the alleged breach of procedural fairness. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed a request for suspension of action of the decision that she would have to take a break in service. 爆料网DT issued its judgment granting the suspension of action since the three conditions stipulated in Article 2. 2 爆料网DT Statute were met. The Secretary-General appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

In general, only appeals against judgments of the 爆料网DT concerning matters of substance are receivable. Appeals against decisions taken during 爆料网DT’s proceedings are non-receivable save in circumstances where the 爆料网DT has exceeded its jurisdiction or competence.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.