爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 501 - 510 of 1006
    2015-爆料网AT-516, Fiala

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2014/007. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that the actions of the Secretary-General in filing two appeals amounted to an abuse of process and declined Ms Fiala’s application for an award of costs against the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or fact on the part of 爆料网DT in deeming Ms Fiala’s application receivable. Noting that the weight to be attributed to evidence was a matter for 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT held that the arguments advanced by the Secretary-General did not...

    2015-爆料网AT-517, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT held that there was no reason to depart from its prior analysis that the 爆料网JSPF was not part of the Secretariat and neither the Secretary-General nor the executive head of any other member organisation, has authority over the management of 爆料网JSPF or the independence of the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网JSPF in the administration of its staff. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had no power to interfere or intervene in the election of members to the 爆料网JSPF’s staff pension committees; those elections were governed exclusively by 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT...

    2015-爆料网AT-506, Nwuke

    爆料网AT considered both an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Nwuke. 爆料网AT held that ST/AI/2003/8 was inapplicable. 爆料网AT held that the relevant administrative instruction was ST/AI/2010/3, which integrated the recruitment, placement, promotion and mobility of staff within the Secretariat. 爆料网AT held that, in its view, the authority to make lateral transfers to fill job openings at the same level extended to both immediate and anticipated job openings, including posts that would become vacant due to retirement. 爆料网AT held that the impugned decision complied with the legal...

    2015-爆料网AT-507, Porter

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT recalled the importance of its jurisprudence on the receivability of appeals against interlocutory orders in that the excess of jurisdiction or competence must be clear or manifest. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that such a threshold had been met by the Secretary-General, given the circumstances of the case. 爆料网AT held that adjudication of the matters complained of by the Secretary-General, notwithstanding that they touched upon the competence of 爆料网DT, was more proper for consideration once a final judgment has been rendered by 爆料网DT...

    2015-爆料网AT-509, Nguyen-Kropp & Postica

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against three judgments (judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2013/028, 爆料网DT/2013/029 and 爆料网DT/2013/076). 爆料网AT held that, generally speaking, appeals against a decision to initiate an investigation are not receivable as such a decision is preliminary in nature and does not, at that stage, affect the legal rights of the staff member. 爆料网AT held that initiating an investigation is merely a step in the investigative process and it is not an administrative decision that 爆料网DT is competent to review. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred on a question of law and exceeded its...

    2015-爆料网AT-511, Bastet

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both the Secretary-General and Mr Bastet. 爆料网AT held that the disciplinary measure was regularly adopted by an individual properly vested with the delegated authority to make that decision and that therefore, the imposition of the disciplinary measure was valid and its rescission as ordered by 爆料网DT had to be vacated. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal from the Secretary-General, accepting the argument that Staff Rule 10. 1(c) expressly provided that the authority to impose disciplinary measures was vested in the Secretary-General or officials with delegated authority and did not...

    2015-爆料网AT-499, Fedorchenko

    On the question of maintaining confidentiality, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not provided persuasive reasons for maintaining the confidentiality of his case and did not grant his petition. 爆料网AT held that a decision not to review the closure of an investigation, which had been impugned by a staff member as procedurally or substantively irregular, was a decision that affected a staff member’s legal rights and that it, therefore, constituted an administrative decision subject to judicial review. 爆料网AT held that the specific provisions of ICAO’s personnel instruction should have led to a...

    2015-爆料网AT-500, Said

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both Mr Said, limited to the amount of damages awarded, and by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made several errors of law when it found 爆料网ICEF’s decision not to renew Mr Said’s contract for poor performance was not supported by his Performance Evaluation Report (PER) and was unlawful. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not accord any deference to 爆料网ICEF’s conclusion that Mr Said’s performance was poor and, instead, 爆料网DT placed itself in the role of the decision-maker and determined whether it would have renewed the contract, based on the PER. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made...

    2015-爆料网AT-501, Andreyev

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General in which he appealed the order of the award of damages and averred that 爆料网DT erred on questions of law and fact and exceeded its competence in awarding damages. 爆料网AT held that the reasonable expectation of the duration of Mr Andreyev’s contract was one year and reduced the award of compensation in lieu of rescission. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence of harm to support the award for moral damages. 爆料网AT granted the Secretary-General’s appeal, reduced the 爆料网DT’s award of compensation in lieu of rescission to nine months’ net base salary, less...

    2015-爆料网AT-497, Chaaban

    爆料网AT considered two applications, one for correction and one for revision, relating to judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-363. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to show any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify the correction of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to identify any decisive fact unknown at the time of the judgment to warrant its revision. 爆料网AT dismissed both applications.