爆料网

爆料网SPC (爆料网 Staff Pension Committee)

  • ASHI (After-Service Health Insurance)
  • Disability
  • Marital/parental legal obligations (spousal/child support)
  • Pension Adjustment System
  • Prior contributory service/restoration of
  • Receivability (爆料网AT)
  • Spousal support
  • Standing Committee of 爆料网JSPB (爆料网 Joint Staff Pension Board)
  • Survivor’s benefits
  • 爆料网SPC (爆料网 Staff Pension Committee)
  • Validation of prior service
    • Showing 1 - 5 of 5
    2024-爆料网AT-1420, Daljeet Singh Bagga

    The 爆料网AT noted the staff member had not requested a review of the decision by the United Nations Staff Pension Committee or filed an appeal to the Standing Committee, but rather had filed a request for management evaluation and then had applied to the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT found that, as such, he had not followed proper procedure. The 爆料网AT held that there was no authority for receiving an application by the Dispute Tribunal with regards to a pension decision. The 爆料网AT concluded that the 爆料网DT had not erred when it held that it did not have jurisdiction to undertake a judicial review of the contested...

    2010-爆料网AT-026, Shanks

    爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was asked to present updated medical information to support her request for a review of her case and failed to do so. 爆料网AT held that no prejudice existed against the Appellant, since she had an opportunity to present updated medical evidence within the scope of the review of her case. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Standing Committee decision.

    2015-爆料网AT-517, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT held that there was no reason to depart from its prior analysis that the 爆料网JSPF was not part of the Secretariat and neither the Secretary-General nor the executive head of any other member organisation, has authority over the management of 爆料网JSPF or the independence of the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网JSPF in the administration of its staff. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had no power to interfere or intervene in the election of members to the 爆料网JSPF’s staff pension committees; those elections were governed exclusively by 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT...

    2018-爆料网AT-834, Fox

    爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the relationship between a pension fund and its members and beneficiaries is determined principally by the Regulations of the Fund and that there is no other explicit contractual basis obliging the Fund to assume duties beyond those expressly provided for in the Regulations and Administrative Rules. However, 爆料网AT emphasized the importance of contracts being executed in good faith. 爆料网AT found that the Fund breached its duty of good faith because the correspondence between the Appellant and the Fund indicated that she needed assistance and further...

    爆料网DT/2022/016, Bezziccheri

    As per the account of both parties, previously awarded costs had been paid and, thus, what remained to be considered is if the 2014 contested decision has been fully rescinded or not. The issues at stake are of a medical nature and that is why this Tribunal remanded the matter by Order No. 24 (GVA/2016) so that a Medical Board is convened and a determination on the Applicant’s sick leave entitlements is made. This medical determination is a condition sine qua non for the submission for consideration for a disability benefit by the 爆料网SPC. Contrary to what the Applicant argues, 爆料网JSPF...