爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered two applications, one for correction and one for revision, relating to judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-363. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to show any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify the correction of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to identify any decisive fact unknown at the time of the judgment to warrant its revision. 爆料网AT dismissed both applications.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-363, 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT’s time-bar finding. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban did not allege any special circumstances that had prevented him from submitting a timely application, but argued that 爆料网RWA DT should have waived the time limit for his application given that it had done so, for a much longer period of time, with respect to the Commissioner-General’s late reply.
Legal Principle(s)
An application seeking review of a final judgment rendered by 爆料网AT can only succeed it if fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established under its Statute.