爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 321 - 330 of 1006
    爆料网DT/2022/044, Shah

    The contested decision identified by the Applicant is not a final administrative decision that is related to the Applicant’s terms of appointment or contract of employment. It is an operational decision of general application that promoted a change in the reporting lines of all staff members serving in that organization. Such a decision is within the scope of the managerial discretion of the organization in question. Accordingly, the application is not receivable ratione materiae.

    2019-爆料网AT-927, Jafari

    爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the legal framework did not establish an automatic right of the staff member to the extension of his or her service beyond the age of retirement upon the submission of the pertinent application, even if she or he satisfied those two conditions. However, 爆料网AT held that, contrary to 爆料网RWA DT’s finding, the Administration has the discretion to deny a request to extend a staff member’s service beyond retirement only in exceptional cases and on account of the interests of 爆料网RWA, which must be reflected clearly and precisely in the reasoning for the decision. 爆料网AT held...

    2019-爆料网AT-929, Abdellaoui

    爆料网AT held that the decision not to short-list the Appellant was an internal step within the selection process and not an administrative decision and that 爆料网DT should have only received her application against the selection decision. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was defective in that the Appellant did not clearly define the grounds of appeal as required under Article 2. 1 of the 爆料网AT Statute, however, 爆料网AT considered the appeal on the basis that the Appellant was self-represented. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s allegation that the case management of 爆料网DT was flawed. 爆料网AT held that the re...

    2010-爆料网AT-097, Dumornay

    爆料网AT preliminarily rejected the Appellant’s request to present additional evidence. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that 爆料网DT made any errors in finding that the Administration met its obligations to the Appellant as a permanent staff member under the applicable Staff Rules and administrative issuances. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was given a three-month temporary appointment after her post was abolished and reasonable efforts were made by the Administration to try to find her a suitable post. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence to support the allegations of...

    2010-爆料网AT-090, Umpleby

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was filed after the deadline for filing appeals had passed and therefore the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the needless forwarding of an English copy of the Judgment to the applicant for her information did not constitute an exceptional case that would justify the extension of the deadline, considering the previous unambiguous communication of the original version of the Judgment in French. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2010-爆料网AT-087, Liyanarachchige

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had erred in law by upholding the decision to summarily dismiss the staff member, which was taken in violation of the requirements of adversarial proceedings and due process. 爆料网AT held that, while the use of statements gathered in the course of an investigation from witnesses who remain anonymous throughout the proceedings, including before 爆料网AT, cannot be excluded as a matter of principle from disciplinary matters, a disciplinary measure may not be founded solely on anonymous statements. 爆料网AT ordered rescission of the contested decision to summarily dismiss the staff...

    2010-爆料网AT-062, Bertucci

    The Secretary-General filed appeals against 爆料网DT Orders. 爆料网AT determined that, generally, only appeals against final judgments are receivable. 爆料网AT noted that an interlocutory appeal is receivable exceptionally in cases where 爆料网DT has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence. 爆料网AT held that it would not interfere lightly with the broad discretion of 爆料网DT in the management of cases. Further, 爆料网AT noted that one of the goals of the new system of administration of justice is rendering timely judgments; cases before 爆料网DT could seldom proceed if either party were able to appeal interlocutory...

    2010-爆料网AT-083, Ihekwaba

    爆料网AT observed that the Appellant did not challenge the reasoning of 爆料网DT, but appealed on the ground that the administrative policy in place should be changed because she was promoted but her gross income was reduced. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s pay calculations also took into account other deductions and increases such that her net income increased. 爆料网AT held that the real issue before it was whether 爆料网DT made a reversible error in fact or law such that it must allow the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not disagree that, on its face, the calculations of her salary were made...

    2010-爆料网AT-078, Zhang

    爆料网AT noted that, even though it found the case non-receivable, 爆料网DT undertook a final review of the Appellant’s allegations and that the case failed on the facts. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the decisions contested in the application, namely that the matters contested did not constitute administrative decisions and therefore her application was not receivable. 爆料网AT held there was no basis to disagree with 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2010-爆料网AT-077, Rasul

    爆料网AT considered an appeal against Order No. 爆料网DT/NBI/O/2010/023 by the Secretary-General. Applying the principle that a party in whose favour a case has been decided is not permitted to appeal against the judgment on legal or academic grounds, 爆料网AT held that the Order had no practical effect following the withdrawal of the request for suspension of action. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was moot as it was academic and sought an opinion regarding the issues raised in the appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.