2010-��AT-087

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that ��DT had erred in law by upholding the decision to summarily dismiss the staff member, which was taken in violation of the requirements of adversarial proceedings and due process. ��AT held that, while the use of statements gathered in the course of an investigation from witnesses who remain anonymous throughout the proceedings, including before ��AT, cannot be excluded as a matter of principle from disciplinary matters, a disciplinary measure may not be founded solely on anonymous statements. ��AT ordered rescission of the contested decision to summarily dismiss the staff member; alternatively, the Secretary-General was ordered to pay 12 months�� net base salary as compensation in lieu of rescission.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The staff member contested the decision to summarily dismiss him for serious misconduct. ��DT rejected his application.

Legal Principle(s)

A disciplinary measure may not be founded solely on anonymous statements.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Liyanarachchige

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement