2010-��AT-083

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT observed that the Appellant did not challenge the reasoning of ��DT, but appealed on the ground that the administrative policy in place should be changed because she was promoted but her gross income was reduced. ��AT noted that the Appellant��s pay calculations also took into account other deductions and increases such that her net income increased. ��AT held that the real issue before it was whether ��DT made a reversible error in fact or law such that it must allow the appeal. ��AT noted that the Appellant did not disagree that, on its face, the calculations of her salary were made according to the provisions Staff Rules, which was the finding, of ��DT. ��AT held there was no error in the ��DT��s decision. ��AT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the calculation of her income following a promotion. ��DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ihekwaba

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement