爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 461 - 470 of 1006
    2015-爆料网AT-604, Ocokoru

    The issue for determination by 爆料网AT was whether the relevant date for the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal ran from the date on which the ALS received the 爆料网DT judgment in its capacity as counsel of record for the Secretary-General before 爆料网DT or the date on which the judgment was received by the OLA, the Secretary-General’s counsel of record before 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that in the absence of any published 爆料网DT rule or practice direction which decreed that transmission of 爆料网DT judgments be made to OLA, it was not permissible for the Secretary-General to seek to rely on the date when the...

    2015-爆料网AT-598, Thweib

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Appellant of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2015/003. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred in any way when it dismissed her application finding it to be moot, an outcome which was a natural consequence of the administrative rescission of the impugned decision, circumstances that contemplated the staff member’s claim and rights, solving the previous irregularity. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s request to amend her application to seek compensation for material and moral damages was filed after she had received notification of the...

    2015-爆料网AT-595, Survo

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Survo and an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in the procedure, including in its findings regarding receivability. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in law in relation to the matters raised by Mr Survo. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred on a question of fact such as to render the decision of 爆料网DT manifestly unreasonable. On the Secretary-General’s appeal of the Special Post Allowance (SPA) issue, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网AT had no primary legal or factual basis from which it could conclude that Mr Survo had properly sought management...

    2015-爆料网AT-594, El Saleh

    爆料网AT considered appeals of both judgment Nos. 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/026 (judgment on the merits) and 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/051 (judgment on revision). 爆料网AT held that the appeal against the judgment on the merits was filed out of time and was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the judgment on revision failed to identify a ground of appeal, expressed disagreement, and repeated arguments already considered and rejected by 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that the appeal constituted an impermissible attempt to reargue the merits of the case. 爆料网AT held that the fact upon which the Appellant had based his revision application did...

    2015-爆料网AT-593, Namrouti

    The Appellant did not raise any challenges as to the merits of the 爆料网RWA DT judgment, but rather his appeal related to the procedure adopted by 爆料网RWA DT in hearing his complaint. 爆料网AT held that it was not persuaded that 爆料网RWA DT erred in procedure or otherwise exceeded its jurisdiction in the exercise of its power, such as to warrant reversal of the judgment. Noting that two Orders clarified the aim of the hearing, 爆料网AT held that there was no prejudice caused to the Appellant by the failure to provide him with a description of the relevance of the witnesses’ testimony. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT...

    2015-爆料网AT-592, Matadi et al

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT accepted the Secretary-General’s position that 爆料网MIL staff members were given the opportunity to comment on the proposed restructuring from the beginning of the process, and the 爆料网MIL National Staff Association representative participated in the discussion on the Guidelines for the comparative review process. 爆料网AT held that it would not speculate on the chances that each of the posts might not have been abolished if there had been consultations with the National Staff Association. 爆料网AT held that the change in the composition of the...

    2015-爆料网AT-596, Musleh

    爆料网AT noted that, despite its Registry’s request for the Appellant to file an appeal brief, the Appellant failed to do so. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was given the opportunity to improve his performance through the further extension of his appointment for an additional six months, but his performance had still not improved. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in the conclusion of 爆料网RWA DT that both the initial decision to extend the Appellant’s probationary period and the subsequent decision not to confirm his appointment were in compliance with his letter of appointment and 爆料网RWA’s regulatory...

    2015-爆料网AT-597, Wu

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT erred in procedure in the following ways: firstly, by denying his request to call a specific witness; secondly, by making allegedly conclusory remarks at the oral hearing; and, thirdly, by refusing to admit further evidence on discrimination and retaliation committed against him in 2014. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit any error of procedure so as to affect the outcome of the present case. 爆料网AT noted that case management issues, including the question of whether to call a certain person to testify, remain within the discretion of 爆料网DT and do...

    2015-爆料网AT-589, Salem

    爆料网AT had before it an appeal of the Commissioner-General and a cross-appeal of Ms Salem. 爆料网AT held that the procedural errors did not amount to an abuse of power. 爆料网AT held that absent an abuse of power, the compensation for moral damages had to be vacated. 爆料网AT granted the appeal, rejected the cross-appeal, and vacated the 爆料网RWA DT judgment in its entirety.

    2015-爆料网AT-584, Gebremariam

    爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s motion to file additional pleadings, noting that the new evidence related to matters falling outside the scope of his application to 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the only legal issue arising for determination was whether the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral damages as a result of the issuance of the reprimand. 爆料网AT held that since the Administration had rescinded the impugned decision even before the Appellant had filed his 爆料网DT application, and by corollary should then have removed the written reprimand and all reference to it...