爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Appellant of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2015/003. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred in any way when it dismissed her application finding it to be moot, an outcome which was a natural consequence of the administrative rescission of the impugned decision, circumstances that contemplated the staff member’s claim and rights, solving the previous irregularity. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s request to amend her application to seek compensation for material and moral damages was filed after she had received notification of the decision to grant the remedies she had sought. 爆料网RWA DT had correctly found that it was at this point that the application had become moot. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s other claims on appeal had no merit and that 爆料网AT did not need to address them. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网RWA DT: The Applicant contested the decision to keep the outcome of a wider investigation and the follow-up correspondence on record when the investigation was not progressed against her. 爆料网RWA DT decided the matter in the Applicant’s favour, but the case was then appealed to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT reversed the 爆料网RWA DT decision and remanded the case back to 爆料网RWA DT before a different Judge. The Respondent later rescinded the impugned decision. The Applicant filed a motion requesting leave to amend her application to seek compensation for material and moral damages. In judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2015/003, 爆料网RWA DT found the Applicant’s application moot and dismissed it.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank.