爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 451 - 460 of 1006
    2014-爆料网AT-415, Santos

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding there was no need for further clarification. 爆料网AT held that the reliance of the Administration on disciplinary/administrative measures to deny the staff member’s conversion to permanent appointment did not give 爆料网DT a carte blanche to go behind the agreed sanctions imposed on 20 April 2009. 爆料网AT held that it was not within 爆料网DT’s competence or jurisdiction to embark on an inquiry into whether the 2009 disciplinary sanctions were lawfully imposed or otherwise...

    2014-爆料网AT-410, Igbinedion

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not act lawfully in issuing an order in direct contravention of the established 爆料网AT jurisprudence. However, 爆料网AT also held that parties before 爆料网DT must obey its binding decisions and that a decision by 爆料网DT remained legally valid until such time as 爆料网AT vacated it. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s refusal to comply with 爆料网DT’s order was vexatious. 爆料网AT reiterated its jurisprudence that the absence of compliance may merit contempt proceedings. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal in part.

    Accountability Referral: The 爆料网AT...

    2015-爆料网AT-607, Zakharov

    爆料网AT held that the decision of the 爆料网JSPB not to submit the staff member’s appeal to the Standing Committee contravened his rights under the 爆料网JSPF Regulations by depriving him of access to the appeals process and was a serious violation of his due process rights. Noting that 爆料网AT’s jurisdiction was limited to hearing appeals of decisions of the Standing Committee and that the staff member’s case had not been reviewed by the Standing Committee, 爆料网AT held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal and remanded it to the Standing Committee.

    2014-爆料网AT-397, Finniss

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that, given the open animosity and ill-feeling between the PCO and the staff member, the Administration should not have included the former in the interview panel. 爆料网AT held that the test for apparent bias applied by 爆料网DT was correct, regardless of whether a fair-minded observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the interview panel was biased. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was best placed to calculate on the evidence the appropriate level of compensation and found no reason to disturb the...

    2014-爆料网AT-398, Kamara

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had nor erred in law or fact rendering its judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to persuade the Court that 爆料网DT’s conclusion of fact had rendered the decision unreasonable as required by Article 2 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the evidence clearly supported the finding of gross negligence and loss of property, as well as the existence of the misconduct. 爆料网AT held that there was no due process violation on the part of the Administration for having charged the Appellant with three accounts of misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct had been established...

    2015-爆料网AT-567, Fedorchenko

    爆料网AT had before it an application for correction of judgment and an application for interpretation of judgment for judgment No. 2015-爆料网AT-499, both submitted by Mr Fedorchenko. 爆料网AT held that Mr Fedorchenko’s applications did not come within the criteria set forth in the relevant statutory provisions. On the application for correction, 爆料网AT held that Mr Fedorchenko did not cite any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify a correction of judgment and failed to identify any meaning or scope of the judgment to justify interpretation or identify which sentences or words were unclear or...

    2014-爆料网AT-400, Tadonki

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since the issues for decision had been clearly defined by the parties’ submissions. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had failed to persuade it that 爆料网DT erred on a question of fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that it was correct to conclude that the Administration had acted unlawfully when it did not renew the staff member’s appointment because there was not enough evidence to support a determination that the staff member had failed to perform his functions. 爆料网AT...

    2015-爆料网AT-604, Ocokoru

    The issue for determination by 爆料网AT was whether the relevant date for the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal ran from the date on which the ALS received the 爆料网DT judgment in its capacity as counsel of record for the Secretary-General before 爆料网DT or the date on which the judgment was received by the OLA, the Secretary-General’s counsel of record before 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that in the absence of any published 爆料网DT rule or practice direction which decreed that transmission of 爆料网DT judgments be made to OLA, it was not permissible for the Secretary-General to seek to rely on the date when the...

    2015-爆料网AT-598, Thweib

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Appellant of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2015/003. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred in any way when it dismissed her application finding it to be moot, an outcome which was a natural consequence of the administrative rescission of the impugned decision, circumstances that contemplated the staff member’s claim and rights, solving the previous irregularity. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant’s request to amend her application to seek compensation for material and moral damages was filed after she had received notification of the...