爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 61 - 70 of 1006
    2025-爆料网AT-1547, Inas Margieh

    The 爆料网AT held that the creation of the position of Deputy Special Representative (DSR), undertaken as part of the implementation of the recommendations to restructure the oPt Office, constituted an administrative decision of a general nature. It further concluded that although the newly established ToR for the DSR position transferred to the incumbent some duties and responsibilities that were previously part of the staff member’s Terms of Reference (ToR), this reallocation alone was insufficient to conclude that the creation of the position of DSR produced direct legal consequences for the...

    2025-爆料网AT-1574, Johnstone Summit Oketch

    The 爆料网AT found that the procedures applied to fill the Position sought by the staff member were consistent with the applicable rules. Although the OCHA advertised the Position without any pre-determined restriction to rostered candidates, and received some 151 applications, it ultimately decided to select a rostered candidate, thereby excluding the staff member and many others from consideration. The 爆料网AT held that the Administration was well within its prerogative to do so, as the plain reading of Section 9.5 of Administrative Instruction ST/AI/2010/3/Rev.1 (Staff selection system) grants...

    2025-爆料网AT-1536, Milunka Tadic

    The 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s restructuring of the finance function was a genuine exercise and a proper use of the Administration’s discretion in responding to evolving needs. The 爆料网AT did not agree that the Administration acted unfairly or unjustly in abolishing the former staff member’s post. The 爆料网AT further held that consultation with the former staff member was not required prior to the abolition of her post.

    The 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s dissatisfaction with the 爆料网DT’s assessment of the evidence of workplace issues between her and her supervisor does not...

    2025-爆料网AT-1530, Leonid Dolgopolov

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member bore the burden of proving that the Secretary-General’s failures to address both the discriminatory policies of the host country and the alleged attempt of the law enforcement authorities of that host country to recruit him, constituted unilateral decisions taken by the Administration, which applied to him individually, and had direct legal consequences on his terms of appointment or contract of employment. The 爆料网AT held that the staff member could not meet this burden because these issues fell within the realm of diplomacy, are subject to the rules of...

    566 (2024), Hakam Mohammad Shahwan
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had filed his appeal of the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment on his application for execution before the 爆料网AT Judgment in the underlying case was issued and the Commissioner-General had an opportunity to address the 爆料网AT Judgment before submitting the answer to the present appeal. The 爆料网AT found that given these circumstances, it was in the interest of procedural fairness to allow the staff member to submit additional pleadings 20 days from the issuance of the Order and not exceeding five pages. The 爆料网AT granted the motion for additional pleadings.

    568 (2024), Ivan Aguilar Valle
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT found that the present motion was distinguishable from a typical motion for withdrawal of an appeal: the non-moving party objects to the withdrawal as a revised appeal would enable the Secretary-General to address arguments included in the answer and, second, the Secretary-General still deems it necessary to pursue an appeal. The 爆料网AT held that its reiteration in a recent case that appeals on the merits and relief should be considered together had not been new and was an insufficient basis on which to request the filing of a revised appeal. The 爆料网AT found, however, that when the 爆料网DT...

    552 (2024), Surendra Bista
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member's motion for the production of evidence did not meet the criteria set out in the 爆料网AT Statute and Rules of Procedure. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting the admission of the additional evidence on appeal. The 爆料网AT noted that, moreover, the staff member had not demonstrated that any relevant fact was likely to be established with the staff member’s half-brother, Mr. SRB’s employment history sought to be produced or that it would be in the interest of justice and the efficient and expeditious...

    550 (2024), Kamal Karki
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member did not seek an interim measure for temporary relief which was consistent with the 爆料网DT Judgment; on the contrary, he sought the opposite, i.e., anonymization which the Dispute Tribunal and the Appeals Tribunal had not granted him. The 爆料网AT also found that the prior 爆料网AT Judgment was res judicata as to the question of anonymity and could be reversed, if at all, only through a revision of judgment. The 爆料网AT denied the staff member’s motion for interim measures.

    548 (2024), Mohamed Ben Madi
    • Appealed

    The 爆料网AT held that the motion was not receivable because the impugned Order was not appealable and the 爆料网DT had acted within its competence and jurisdiction in finding that the non-renewal decision had been prima facie lawful. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s request for reinstatement to his previous position could be considered as “temporary relief to prevent irreparable harm” but it was instead an interlocutory appeal of the denial of the suspension of action which was not permitted. The 爆料网AT also noted that granting the staff member’s request would not maintain consistency with the...