550 (2024), Kamal Karki
- Appealed
The 爆料网AT held that the staff member did not seek an interim measure for temporary relief which was consistent with the 爆料网DT Judgment; on the contrary, he sought the opposite, i.e., anonymization which the Dispute Tribunal and the Appeals Tribunal had not granted him. The 爆料网AT also found that the prior 爆料网AT Judgment was res judicata as to the question of anonymity and could be reversed, if at all, only through a revision of judgment. The 爆料网AT denied the staff member’s motion for interim measures.