爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 431 - 440 of 1006
    2014-爆料网AT-494, Sutherland et al

    爆料网AT considered motions seeking execution of four judgments (judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-359, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-358, and judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-360). 爆料网AT denied these motions, noting that execution did occur in each of the cases. 爆料网AT also noted that payment of the moral damages had been effected and a new conversion process had been completed, thus, none of the applications merited an order for execution pursuant to Article 11(4) of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 27 of the 爆料网AT RoP. With respect to Ademagic et al. and Mr Longone’s motion to hold decision letters in...

    2014-爆料网AT-493, Das

    爆料网AT considered Ms Das’s application for Interpretation of judgment with respect to the award of interest on the compensatory damages and any remaining termination benefits and entitlements. 爆料网AT noted that its earlier jurisprudence held that interest was to be paid at the US Prime rate from the date on which the entitlement becomes due, which in this case is the date of the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT noted that it had merely affirmed the award of compensatory damages and termination benefits by 爆料网DT and had not initiated it. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Secretary-General’s claim that...

    2014-爆料网AT-483, Mashhour

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by concluding that ST/AI/2002/3 applied to 爆料网ICEF, as the 爆料网ICEF Handbook establishes the procedure that a staff member must follow should they wish to rebut the content of their performance report. 爆料网AT noted that the principle articulated in Villamoran v. Secretary-General of the United Nations (2011-爆料网AT-160), which holds that administrative issuances have greater legal authority over manuals such as the 爆料网ICEF Handbook, only where there is a conflict between guidelines and manuals and a properly promulgated...

    2014-爆料网AT-472, Nianda-Lusakueno

    爆料网AT recalled that it has consistently held that Article 8(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute must be read literally to prohibit 爆料网DT from waiving the deadlines for seeking management evaluation and that 爆料网DT has no jurisdiction or competence to waive such deadlines. 爆料网AT held that ignorance of the law is no excuse and, while it was unfort爆料网ATe that Mr. Nianda-Lusakueno relied on the informal review procedure, such reliance did not qualify as exceptional circumstances under ICAO Staff Rule 111. 1, paragraph 8. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Secretary-General of ICAO.

    2014-爆料网AT-469, Eissa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General which challenged the remedies afforded Mr Eissa. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the Secretary-General’s contention that 爆料网DT erred in not explaining which irregularities were substantive and which were procedural, as either type of irregularity may support an award of moral damages. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the Secretary-General’s contention that the award was duplicative of the award of alternative compensation in lieu of rescission. 爆料网AT noted that an award under Article 10(5)(a) of the 爆料网DT Statute is alternative...

    2014-爆料网AT-464, Vorobiev

    爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee did not err in holding the application was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT noted that, in refusing to receive the application, the Standing Committee also implicitly refused to find “good cause” to waive the sixty days’ time limit for review set forth in Section K of the 爆料网JSPF Administrative Rules. 爆料网AT also found no error in this implicit determination and held that a waiver of five years for review by the Standing Committee would be unreasonable, especially in light of the time limits in the Transfer Agreement between 爆料网JSPF and CTBTO. 爆料网AT...

    2014-爆料网AT-465, Gonzalez-Hernandez

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网JSPF correctly applied Article 45 of the 爆料网JPSF Regulations and relied on an internationally binding judgment about spousal and child support, issued by an Austrian court, which was not contradicted by the divorce decree issued by a Portuguese court. 爆料网AT found no error of law or fact such as to vitiate the contested decision and upheld 爆料网JSPF’s “reasoned and well-founded decision.” 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网JPSB decision.

    2014-爆料网AT-466, Saffir and Ginivan

    爆料网AT considered the appeals by the Secretary-General challenging 爆料网DT’s determination that the decision not to investigate 爆料网SU election matters was receivable. 爆料网AT held by majority that the appeal was not receivable, based on jurisprudence that a party may not appeal against a judgment in which it has prevailed. 爆料网AT noted that although 爆料网DT reviewed the merits of the decision despite the Secretary-General’s argument that the decision was not receivable ratione materiae, 爆料网DT found in favour of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that, as there was no negative impact to the Secretary-General...

    2014-爆料网AT-471, Landgraf

    The Appellant requested that the 爆料网DT judgment be set aside and that the case be remanded to 爆料网DT for a hearing de novo before a different judge. 爆料网AT agreed with the Appellant’s submission that the relevant statute or rules of procedure do not prohibit an applicant from providing testimony and serving as a witness in their own case. 爆料网AT noted that, while 爆料网DT was required to administer the declaration prescribed in Article 17(3) of the 爆料网DT RoP, 爆料网DT’s failure to do so was not an error serious enough so as to affect the decision of the case. Conversely, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s refusal to...