2014-��AT-491

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered Ms Roig��s application for correction and noted that there were no clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the judgment. ��AT noted that the correction procedure is not an opportunity for a party to reargue their case or to merely repeat arguments that did not previously succeed. ��AT dismissed the application for correction.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Former ��AT judgment: Ms Roig challenged the selection of another candidate for a position. ��DT rejected her application as time-barred and not receivable. ��AT affirmed ��DT��s decision and dismissed Ms Roig��s appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

The correction procedure is not an opportunity for a party to reargue their case or to merely repeat arguments that did not previously succeed.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Roig

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement