爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 421 - 430 of 1006
    2013-爆料网AT-318, Frechon

    爆料网AT considered an application for execution of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-132 filed by Ms Frechon. Ms Frechon sought execution of what she maintained was the order of 爆料网AT, namely, that the Secretary-General should pay her two years’ salary in lieu of an effective reinstatement. 爆料网AT held that the order in respect of which Ms Frechon sought execution was not an order which was affirmed by 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that Ms Frechon could seek execution of 爆料网AT’s order to the extent that the Secretary-General failed to reinstate her for the purpose of the correct procedure, thereby entitling her to the remedy...

    2013-爆料网AT-286, Charles

    爆料网AT noted that the Appellant merely repeated arguments submitted before 爆料网DT and recalled that an appellant has the burden of satisfying 爆料网AT that the 爆料网DT judgment was defective and must state the grounds upon which he or she relies, and that merely stating disagreement or repeating previous arguments was insufficient. 爆料网AT held that Secretary-General’s reports and memoranda lacked the legal authority vested in properly promulgated administrative issuances. 爆料网AT noted the relevant administrative instruction on the staff selection process (ST/AI/2010/3) was silent on the requirement for...

    2013-爆料网AT-284, Charles

    爆料网AT considered that: the Appellant had responded in the negative to two questions about his experience in the pre-screening questions, but that he was long-listed; 爆料网DT had decided that the hiring manager did not commit a procedural error in not evaluating all candidates, but took into consideration the objective criteria i. e. the years of experience required; the Administration was in a position to justify its decisions as not arbitrary; and the Appellant failed to meet his burden of proving the alleged discrimination. 爆料网AT held that the appeal expressed disagreement with the impugned...

    2013-爆料网AT-281, Pacheco

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify any evidence that contradicted the findings of 爆料网DT regarding the abolition of her post. 爆料网AT recalled the broad discretion of 爆料网DT to determine the admissibility of evidence and the discretion of 爆料网DT to decide whether the presence of witnesses is required and to limit oral evidence. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网DT erred in declining to hear the proffered evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in allowing testimony to be given at its hearing that was neither sworn, affirmed, nor made under a promise to tell the...

    2013-爆料网AT-323, Sims

    爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-154. 爆料网AT held that the new evidence was irrelevant because the case was not receivable; neither 爆料网DT nor 爆料网AT had jurisdiction to hear Mr. Sims’ case. 爆料网AT denied the application.

    2013-爆料网AT-319, Laeijendecker

    爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-158. 爆料网AT held that there was no new fact such as to meet the criteria set out in Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that Mr Laeijendecker sought to re-argue or reopen issues. 爆料网AT held that insofar as Mr Laeijendecker sought interpretation of the impugned judgment, paragraphs 29, 30 and 31 were clear on their face and had to be read in conjunction with paragraphs 27 and 28, and paragraphs 32-35. On the allegation of bias, 爆料网AT held that Mr Laeijendecker’s submissions amounted to no more than completely...

    2013-爆料网AT-316, Basenko

    爆料网AT considered Ms Basenko’s application for revision of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-139. 爆料网AT held that the reference made by 爆料网AT to the precedent in Gabaldon (judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-139) could not be regarded as a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that it was unable to see any valid ground for revision within the purview of Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the application.

    2013-爆料网AT-315, Abbasi

    爆料网AT considered an application for revision and an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-112, both filed by Ms Abbasi. On the application for revision, 爆料网AT held that it constituted a disguised way to criticise the impugned judgment or to disagree with it, noting that the rules did not allow the use of an application for revision for such a goal or to modify, complete or improve a 爆料网AT judgment. 爆料网AT held that, even if the “cheating” in the written test had been qualified as previously unknown and not due to Ms Abbasi’s negligence, it would not have had a decisive impact on...

    2014-爆料网AT-494, Sutherland et al

    爆料网AT considered motions seeking execution of four judgments (judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-359, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-358, and judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-360). 爆料网AT denied these motions, noting that execution did occur in each of the cases. 爆料网AT also noted that payment of the moral damages had been effected and a new conversion process had been completed, thus, none of the applications merited an order for execution pursuant to Article 11(4) of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 27 of the 爆料网AT RoP. With respect to Ademagic et al. and Mr Longone’s motion to hold decision letters in...

    2014-爆料网AT-493, Das

    爆料网AT considered Ms Das’s application for Interpretation of judgment with respect to the award of interest on the compensatory damages and any remaining termination benefits and entitlements. 爆料网AT noted that its earlier jurisprudence held that interest was to be paid at the US Prime rate from the date on which the entitlement becomes due, which in this case is the date of the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT noted that it had merely affirmed the award of compensatory damages and termination benefits by 爆料网DT and had not initiated it. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Secretary-General’s claim that...