爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered that: the Appellant had responded in the negative to two questions about his experience in the pre-screening questions, but that he was long-listed; 爆料网DT had decided that the hiring manager did not commit a procedural error in not evaluating all candidates, but took into consideration the objective criteria i. e. the years of experience required; the Administration was in a position to justify its decisions as not arbitrary; and the Appellant failed to meet his burden of proving the alleged discrimination. 爆料网AT held that the appeal expressed disagreement with the impugned judgment, was repetitive and that there were no new arguments. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was an attempt to have a hearing de novo of the application. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested his non-selection for a post. 爆料网DT dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
Before 爆料网AT, it is not sufficient for an appellant to state that he or she disagrees with the outcome of the case or repeat the arguments submitted before 爆料网DT. The appellant has the burden of satisfying 爆料网AT that the judgment rendered by 爆料网DT is defective and it follows that the appellant must identify the alleged defects in the judgment and state the grounds relied upon in asserting that the judgment is defective.