爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 401 - 410 of 1006
    2013-爆料网AT-359, Ademagic et al. and McIlwraith

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal Ademagic et al. 爆料网AT held that judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 爆料网DT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal on that issue; 爆料网AT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...

    2013-爆料网AT-358, Longone

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal by Mr. Longone. 爆料网AT held that judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members was vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 爆料网DT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal on that issue; 爆料网AT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...

    2013-爆料网AT-344, Pio

    爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Respondent’s argument that the existence of official CPI data for Argentina of itself rendered the Standing Committee impotent as far as a consideration of the Appellant’s request. 爆料网AT held that the matters could be raised by 爆料网JSPF of its own volition or where a concerned beneficiary applied for the application of paragraph 26. 爆料网AT held that the Respondent’s arguments that the Appellant’s complaint had been dealt with by historical benefits that accrued to him were unpersuasive. 爆料网AT held that the impugned decision was, in effect, a failure by the...

    2013-爆料网AT-343, Larghi

    爆料网AT determined that by refusing to review the staff member’s request, the 爆料网JSPB had failed to properly exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to paragraph 26 of the PAS, whose very purpose “is to address the issue of whether the application of official Consumer Price Index (CPI) data results in ‘aberrant results’ or the situation where no up-to-date CPI data is available”. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal, vacated the decision of the Standing Committee of the 爆料网JSPB to reject the staff member’s request that the 爆料网JSPF discontinue the local track in application of paragraph 26 of the PAS, and remanded the...

    2013-爆料网AT-338, Dzuverovic

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Ms Dzuverovic and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. On consideration of Ms Dzuverovic’s appeal, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make an error of law in concluding that the application was not receivable ratione materiae, as the Appellant had failed to seek management evaluation of the contested decision and made no written request to extend the deadline. On consideration of the Secretary-General’s request in its cross-appeal to order the redaction of the paragraphs containing recommendations by 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT held that the approach of 爆料网DT did not merit the remedy...

    2013-爆料网AT-332, McCluskey

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit an error of fact or law when it concluded that the difference of treatment between the Appellant and his former colleagues who had undergone a competitive selection process was lawful. 爆料网AT held that it was reasonable and lawful to treat them differently at the time of deciding about the possible extension of his fixed-term appointment because equality meant not only the equal treatment of equals but also the unequal treatment of unequal. 爆料网AT held that there was no flaw in the motivation of the impugned judgment that could result in a manifestly unreasonable...

    2013-爆料网AT-327, Tiwathia

    爆料网AT noted that appeals from 爆料网DT decisions on suspensions of action will only be receivable if 爆料网DT, in adjudicating such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s legal and factual reasoning fell entirely within its competence and jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that, although the Appellant’s claims addressed the merits of the 爆料网DT judgment, they did not amount to claims that the 爆料网DT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网DT dismissed the appeal.

    2013-爆料网AT-314, Mpacko

    爆料网AT held that Ms Mpacko’s claims addressed the merits of the 爆料网DT decision and did not amount to claims that the 爆料网DT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction in denying her application for suspension of action. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction in denying Ms Mpacko’s application for suspension of action. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable.