2013-惇蹋厙AT-343

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT determined that by refusing to review the staff member＊s request, the 惇蹋厙JSPB had failed to properly exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to paragraph 26 of the PAS, whose very purpose ※is to address the issue of whether the application of official Consumer Price Index (CPI) data results in ＆aberrant results＊ or the situation where no up-to-date CPI data is available§. 惇蹋厙AT upheld the appeal, vacated the decision of the Standing Committee of the 惇蹋厙JSPB to reject the staff member＊s request that the 惇蹋厙JSPF discontinue the local track in application of paragraph 26 of the PAS, and remanded the case to the Standing Committee.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

惇蹋厙JSPF decision: The Applicant contested the decision not to ※discontinue§ the ※local track§, in application of paragraph 26(c) of the Pension Adjustment System (PAS). The Standing Committee rejected the application, noting that under paragraph 14 of the [PAS], the Fund is required to use the official CPI rates for each country as published in the 惇蹋厙 Monthly Bulletin of Statistics.

Legal Principle(s)

The Pension Fund has the statutory jurisdiction, pursuant to paragraph 26 of the PAS, to discontinue or suspend the ※local track§ currency for a particular country when it would lead to aberrant results.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Larghi

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement