爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 191 - 200 of 1006
    2023-爆料网AT-1380, Said Hassan Awad

    The 爆料网AT found that the relief sought in the application concerned an issue not previously raised before the 爆料网DT or the 爆料网AT, being the recovery of an amount already paid as an admissible expense on a sliding scale.

    The 爆料网AT held that there was nothing in the meaning or scope of the prior Judgment that was unclear or ambiguous, the terms of the order were clear. The 爆料网AT noted there was no need to interpret the prior Judgment to clarify its meaning, nor were there reasonable doubts about what constituted the 爆料网AT’s decision or the reasons for it.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that there was also...

    2023-爆料网AT-1379, Leopold Camille Yodjeu Ntemde

    The 爆料网AT considered three appeals by the applicant.

    The 爆料网AT found that the impugned Order was an interlocutory order and was obviously beyond the competence of the 爆料网AT.

    The 爆料网AT held that the applicant had not submitted documents to prove being a United Nations staff member and that he had no legal standing before the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT noted that there was no evidence of an offer of appointment having been issued to him for either post. Second, he failed to complete the pre-recruitment formalities for both posts. Third, he failed to confirm, within a reasonable time, his interest and...

    2023-爆料网AT-1378, Prakash Neupane

    The 爆料网AT dismissed Mr. Neupane's contention that the 爆料网DT erred when it found that he was contesting the reassignment decision when in fact he was contesting the lack of his Field Central Review Board clearance and roster membership for the reassigned post. The application was quite unclear, and focused mainly on the question of regularity of the reassignment decision which was in line with Mr. Neupane’s request for management evaluation challenging directly and clearly his reassignment. The issue of rostering was raised only as an argument to prove the alleged procedural irregularity of Mr...

    爆料网DT/2023/113, Abdellaoui

    It is within the discretion of the Applicant’s SRO to make comments on her performance. “[M]aking comments in an ePAS about the need for a staff member to improve performance in certain core values and competencies is an important tool for the managers to carry out their functions in the interest of the Organization and, hence, their willingness to do so need to be supported and boosted”. It represents a legitimate exercise of administrative hierarchy evaluating employees.

    The comments in question do not detract from the overall satisfactory performance appraisal. They are constructive...

    2023-爆料网AT-1376, Samuel Bwalya

    Mr. Bwalya appealed.

    The 爆料网AT found that Mr. Bwalya had not demonstrated that the 爆料网DT erred in finding that it had been established by clear and convincing evidence that he had committed misconduct by instructing a 爆料网DP staff member to forge a backdated Memorandum of Understanding between the Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture and the private firm Digata and to make a misrepresentation in a second document, intentionally acting to avoid or deviate from 爆料网DP’s Financial Regulations, Rules and Procedures through the creation of these documents, and demonstrating favouritism in the award of a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1372, AAM

    As a preliminary matter, the 爆料网AT granted AAM’s request for anonymity. Considering that the Judgment set out medical details regarding AAM, the 爆料网AT found it necessary to protect his confidential information.

    The 爆料网AT found that there were four issues for adjudication on appeal: 1) whether AAM’s appeal was moot/premature in light of a pending medical determination; 2) whether the 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Controller had the delegated authority to deny AAM’s claim for compensation under Appendix D; 3) whether the 爆料网DT erred in finding that the decision of the Controller was reasonable...

    2022-爆料网AT-1237, Ade Mamonyane Beatrice Lekoetje

    The 爆料网AT reviewed the submission of the Secretary-General that Ms. Lekoetje had already repaid the amounts due to the Organization when she separated from service. The 爆料网AT acknowledged that Ms. Lekoetje agreed with the Secretary-General’s position, and confirmed that USD 20,987.91 had already been deducted from her final entitlements.

    Accordingly, the 爆料网AT accepted this position, and interpreted Judgment No. 2022-爆料网AT-1227 as requiring a payment by the Organization to Ms. Lekoetje of a sum equal to one year’s net base salary, but without any further deductions.

    2022-爆料网AT-1236, Marius Mihail Russo-Got

    The decisive fact relied on by the Secretary-General to justify a revision of the 爆料网AT judgment is said to be that Mr. Russo-Got inserted false information in his candidature regarding his alleged experience with NATO. The Secretary-General submits that he first became aware of this fact formally when it was made known to 爆料网OPS after the issuance of the 爆料网AT judgment.

    爆料网AT held that the facts advanced by the Secretary-General, namely the allegedly false information Mr. Russo-Got had inserted in his candidature, could not be decisive of the Secretary-General’s case and enable him to now...

    2022-爆料网AT-1189, Louis Savadogo

    The 爆料网AT noted that in this case, the JAB made not a decision, but rather a recommendation to the Registrar of the ITLOS, who in turn, purported to make the decision about Mr. Savadogo’s appeal. The 爆料网AT recognized that the ITLOS changed and consolidated the relevant Staff Regulations and Rules so that the JAB now makes decisions (from which appeals may be brought to the 爆料网AT) rather than, as occurred in this case, recommendations to the Registrar of the ITLOS, which the Registrar may or may not accept. However, this amendment came too late for the parties in this case. Thus, the original...

    爆料网DT/2023/029, Fernando Salon

    The Applicant claims that several events of prohibited conduct occurred between 2018 and 2022 affecting him. However, he did not follow the procedural path under Bulletins ST/SGB/2008/5 (Prohibition of discrimination, harassment, including sexual harassment, and abuse of authority) and ST/SGB/2019/8 (Addressing discrimination, harassment, including sexual harassment, and abuse of authority) for the handling of formal reports of prohibited conduct and the Dispute Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to conduct an investigation into such allegations.

    There is no evidence that the Applicant ever...