爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 151 - 160 of 1006
    2024-爆料网AT-1425, Osvaldo Di Mario

    The 爆料网AT held that the terms of the impugned Judgment were sufficiently clear and unambiguous to be enforceable, and consequently, the former staff member’s application was not receivable. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that there was no ambiguity concerning the correctness of the grounds for and the nature of the disciplinary measure taken by the Administration against the former staff member.

    Similarly, the 爆料网AT held that the reasoning regarding the referral of the case to the High Commissioner for possible action to enforce accountability was clear and unambiguous. However, even if the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1429, Hakam Shahwan

    The 爆料网AT held that with no evidence of a manifest abuse of proceedings by the Commissioner-General before the 爆料网RWA DT, nor any finding by the 爆料网RWA DT of such an abuse of proceedings, the legal cost orders made by the Dispute Tribunal did not accord with the terms of Article 10 of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute and were therefore unjustified and could not be sustained. Moreover, if the 爆料网AT considered that the legal costs were awarded by the 爆料网RWA DT under Article 10(5)(b) (which was not apparent from the Judgment), there existed no basis to justify such an order given the evidence before the Dispute...

    2024-爆料网AT-1437, Ibrahim Bah

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had telecommuted from his home country for the entire academic year. The 爆料网AT found that payment of the educational grant required the physical presence of the staff member at their official duty station, with such payment to be suspended or adjusted for the period that they were telecommuting from outside the official duty station.

    The 爆料网AT held that it was not open to the staff member to rely on a defence that the Administration be estopped from relying on the applicable provisions in its interpretation of the circumstances under which the education...

    2024-爆料网AT-1438, Ann-Christin Raschdorf

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision, finding that none of the alleged new facts were “new facts” for the purpose of Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The alleged new facts either occurred after the issuance of the 爆料网AT Judgment, were known to the Appeals Tribunal, or matters of law.

    The 爆料网AT granted the application for correction in part, to the extent that the 爆料网AT agreed with Ms. Raschdorf's argument that an error arose in paragraph 44 of the 爆料网AT Judgment where the 爆料网AT wrongly referred to the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims instead of the Pension Fund.

    Finally, the...

    爆料网DT/2024/030, Navas Castillo

    The Applicant was under the obligation to act with a minimum level of probity, impartiality, fairness, honesty and truthfulness as required by the established facts (staff regulation 1.2(b)). Also, if it is found that an actual or possible conflict of interest arose out of these facts, the Applicant was obliged to disclose this conflict to his head of office in order to allow 爆料网VMC to mitigate its impact and resolve it in accordance with its own best interests (staff regulation 1.2(m)). Finally, if the Applicant’s involvement in a matter could result in an actual or potential conflict of...

    爆料网DT/2024/032, Aguilar Valle

    Considering the circumstances, the most appropriate remedy would be to rescind the contested decision (in comparison, see the Appeals Tribunal in Lucchini 2021-爆料网AT-1121 and Rolli 2023-爆料网AT-1346).

    It is standard practice and courtesy in the Organization that, albeit fixed-term appointments, per definition, do not carry any expectancy of renewal under staff rule 4.13(c), a staff member whose fixed-term appointment is not to be renewed is to receive a pre-notification concerning the non-extension, at least 30 days before its expiry. The Respondent has not argued or submitted any documentation...

    2024-爆料网AT-1414, Tejbir Singh Soni

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member did not fulfil the requirements for revision of the prior 爆料网AT Judgment. The 爆料网AT found that no new fact was advanced by the staff member that had been unknown either to him or the 爆料网AT at the time of the prior Judgment, nor one that would have been decisive in reaching the decision had it been known. The 爆料网AT was of the view that his application for revision amounted to a restatement of the material already placed before the 爆料网AT, which had been considered and rejected, and constituted an attempt to have the appeal, which had been disposed of, re-heard de...

    2024-爆料网AT-1411, AAU

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s attempts to reargue her case failed to identify any reviewable error in the 爆料网DT Judgment, warranting alone dismissal of her appeal. In any event, regardless of the merits of her claim, the 爆料网AT found that her application was time-barred under Article 8(4) of the 爆料网DT Statute since she filed it 27 years after her receipt of the contested decision. Recalling that there is no authority given to either tribunal to extend time limits in these circumstances, the 爆料网AT concluded that the 爆料网DT was correct to conclude that her application was not receivable.

    The...

    2024-爆料网AT-1416, Langa Dorji

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member's application for revision failed to meet the statutory requirements outlined in Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The 爆料网AT concluded that the staff member's arguments essentially reiterated those he previously advanced before the 爆料网AT and the 爆料网DT. As a result, the 爆料网AT held that his application for revision amounted to a request for the 爆料网AT to reconsider his previous unsuccessful appeal. Moreover, the 爆料网AT observed that the applicant's submissions contained a number of unfair and inappropriate accusations against persons who had dealt with his case, and...