爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 141 - 150 of 1006
    2024-爆料网AT-1444, Yelena Goldenberg

    The 爆料网AT held that the Administration did not act unreasonably or unlawfully in requiring the staff member to work from the office two days per week. It further held that relevant considerations, including the staff member’s personal and medical circumstances, were taken into consideration, and irrelevant considerations were excluded. The 爆料网AT also found that there was no obligation on the Administration to establish that the requested accommodations represented a disproportionate or undue burden on the workplace.

    The 爆料网AT also found no merit in the staff member’s argument that the lack of...

    2024-爆料网AT-1452, Ousmane Tamba Dia

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not commit any error in procedure that affected the outcome of the case by partially denying the former staff member’s motions for production of additional evidence or by not granting him sufficient additional time to respond to the Secretary-General’s submissions.

    The 爆料网AT also concluded that the 爆料网DT appropriately identified the contested decision as the 1 April 2022 decision finding him ineligible to participate in ASHI. The 爆料网AT observed that the former staff member himself identified this decision in both his 爆料网DT application and his management evaluation...

    2024-爆料网AT-1449, Michael David Antoine

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member publicly engaged in acts of a sexual nature in a clearly marked United Nations vehicle, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT had before it a video clip depicting the actions in question, which were clearly of a sexual nature.

    The 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT that the lawfulness of the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1448, Ray Steven Millan

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member allowed an unauthorized female individual to board a United Nations vehicle assigned to him and to publicly commit acts of a sexual nature in the rear seat, bringing disrepute to the Organization and difficulties with the host country.

    The 爆料网AT found that the case was not one where the issues required the 爆料网DT’s determination of the credibility of contradicting testimonies of parties or witnesses and the lack of a 爆料网DT hearing had not affected its decision. The 爆料网DT appropriately considered the former staff member's admissions, as well as the video clip...

    2024-爆料网AT-1445, Moner Ahmed Nasser

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s application for revision failed to meet the statutory requirements outlined in Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. It found that the facts raised by the staff member were not unknown to him before the issuance of the 爆料网AT Judgment and, in any event, would not have changed the outcome of the case, which was found to be not receivable. The 爆料网AT further held that the staff member’s arguments were irrelevant and reiterated those he previously advanced before the 爆料网AT.

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.

    Accountability Referral: The 爆料网AT noted...

    2024-爆料网AT-1409, Lillian Ular

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member failed to provide evidence to prove entitlement to compensation for harm suffered. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that no evidence was submitted proving a nexus between the illegality committed and any harm suffered by the former staff member as a result. The 爆料网AT highlighted that the medical report submitted by the former staff member recorded that she had complained of lack of sleep and headaches “for several years” and that such symptoms were consistent with a previous diagnosed medical condition.

    As to the costs of the appeal, since there was no...

    2024-爆料网AT-1419, Nicole Wynn

    The 爆料网AT noted that the Dispute Tribunal had issued the impugned Order granting the request to extend the time limit for filing the application without the adversely-affected party being heard and without authority to do so. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT had not technically complied with its own Practice Direction in issuing the Order and may have strictly violated the principles of natural justice and due process by failing to give the Secretary-General adequate notice of the motion and an opportunity to reply.

    The 爆料网AT observed, however, that the 爆料网DT had accepted the staff member’s averment...

    2024-爆料网AT-1420, Daljeet Singh Bagga

    The 爆料网AT noted the staff member had not requested a review of the decision by the United Nations Staff Pension Committee or filed an appeal to the Standing Committee, but rather had filed a request for management evaluation and then had applied to the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT found that, as such, he had not followed proper procedure. The 爆料网AT held that there was no authority for receiving an application by the Dispute Tribunal with regards to a pension decision. The 爆料网AT concluded that the 爆料网DT had not erred when it held that it did not have jurisdiction to undertake a judicial review of the contested...

    2024-爆料网AT-1422, John Njuguna Bernard

    The 爆料网AT held that by requesting management evaluation of the negative outcome of the reclassification process, the staff member breached procedural prerequisites. Instead, he should have appealed the contested decision as laid down in Sections 5 and 6 of ST/AI/1998/9 (System for the classification of posts). As the staff member’s application was not receivable, the 爆料网AT found that it could not consider his submissions and additional evidence concerning the merits of the case. The 爆料网AT denied the staff member’s request for compensation in light of its decision to affirm the impugned...

    2024-爆料网AT-1421, Nuha Yahya Abduh Mohammad

    The 爆料网AT found that an objective reading of the staff member’s request for decision review showed clearly that she had only contested the second and not the first reprimand, both issued for not performing assigned teaching tasks. The 爆料网AT considered references to the official having issued it, its date and the remedy sought indicated in the request. The 爆料网AT therefore held that the 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in fact or in law when it considered that the staff member had not submitted a request for decision review in respect of the first reprimand and found the application in the respective part...