爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 81 - 90 of 1006
    2025-爆料网AT-1523, Madhumita Hosali

    The 爆料网AT expressed serious concern about the lack of a sufficient record of reasons supporting the choice of the selected candidate over the staff member at the time of the contested decision.

    The 爆料网AT found that gender and geographical considerations were unevenly applied in the selection exercise, positively assessing the British male while ignoring or discounting that the staff member was an Indian female. Contrary to Staff Regulation 4.4, in which the fullest regard should be given to internal candidates, the 爆料网AT found that her 爆料网 experience was used to disadvantage her. The 爆料网AT also...

    2025-爆料网AT-1517, Ayesha Al Rifai

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to support that the applicant had engaged in abuse of authority by intimidating a staff member to file a false complaint of sexual harassment against another staff member. The 爆料网RWA DT weighed the conflicting testimonies and assessed the credibility of the witnesses and found that she had a motive to solicit the false complaint.

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in declining to review the other misconduct allegations against her, given that the abuse of authority allegation was the...

    2025-爆料网AT-1545, Afaf Khaled Abu Shakra et. al.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT had correctly assessed the Agency’s application of the experience level requirements applicable to the Appellants. Specifically, regarding the teachers contesting their classification at Grade 9, the 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网RWA DT’s review of the Area Staff Post Description, which required five years of teaching experience at Grade 9 for classification at Grade 10.As the Appellants classified at Grade 9 did not meet this requirement, the 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT had correctly concluded that they were appropriately classified at Grade 9.

    The 爆料网AT further...

    2025-爆料网AT-1539, Desire Hatungimana

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT acted correctly by conducting a judicial review of the case.

    It found that the 爆料网DT properly assessed the credibility of the witnesses who testified before it and correctly relied on the credible testimony of Ms. V, who had no motive to lie, to conclude that it had been established by clear and convincing evidence that the former staff member had sexually harassed her by making comments of a sexual nature in May and December 2020.While Ms. V’s testimony alone would have been sufficient in this context, the 爆料网AT noted that it was corroborated by colleagues who were...

    2025-爆料网AT-1527, BK

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had a medical condition requiring attention which impacted his ability to return to work, and he had consented to the Independent Medical Examination and had not challenged those records before the 爆料网DT nor on appeal.

    The 爆料网AT held that even if ST/AI/2019/1 were applicable to 爆料网HCR staff members or taken as a model of just practice, it would not have rendered the Independent Medical Examination improper.

    The 爆料网AT found no basis to overturn the 爆料网DT’s determination that there had been no evidence of bias or conflict of interest in either the medical...

    2025-爆料网AT-1526, BK

    The 爆料网AT noted that the impugned Orders denying the staff member’s requests for anonymity had been issued less than a month after the 爆料网DT had granted his motion for anonymity in another case.

    The 爆料网AT found that the impugned Orders did not exist in isolation and the interaction of all these proceedings rendered the situation exceptional. The 爆料网AT held that denying him anonymity for his two applications alone would defeat the purpose of anonymity and, in the unique circumstances of these proceedings, this inconsistency was prejudicial to the integrity of the internal justice system. The 爆料网AT...

    2025-爆料网AT-1541, Mirriam Nalugya Kiingi

    The 爆料网AT noted that the 爆料网DT’s findings had been based on credible evidence when it determined that the staff member’s son had contracted Covid-19; he had been treated under the supervision of her primary medical care provider; and payment had been made based on invoices from that provider reflecting the care he had provided.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that in light of the testimony of the staff member’s witnesses, including herself and the medical professional who had treated her son, it had not been erroneous for the 爆料网DT to conclude that the Administration had failed to establish the medical...

    2025-爆料网AT-1520, Shahd Ghabbash

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member’s transfer request had been approved by the West Bank Field Office but the Jordan Field Office had subsequently informed that the request could not be accommodated due to a commitment to the roadmap on hiring daily-paid workers in fixed-term posts.

    The 爆料网AT held that the Commissioner-General had demonstrated the efforts made by both Field Offices to process the transfer request and the Agency’s burden to show that the request had been given full and fair consideration was satisfied. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member had not discharged the burden of...

    爆料网DT/2025/029, Christian Castelli

     

    Regarding claim 1, the Tribunal held that based on the evidence on record, the Applicant did not provide any evidence that could prove any form of misconduct against the OIOS or 爆料网IFIL officials who handled his complaint. Accordingly, claim 1 was rejected.

    For claim 2, the Tribunal noted that, upon his request, via emails dated 22 August 2024 and 31 October 2024, the OIOS provided the Applicant with an explanation for the closure of his Complaint without investigation. Therefore, claim 2 was found to be moot.

    Claim 3 was found not receivable. The Tribunal held that the outcome of a management...