爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 681 - 690 of 1006
    2019-爆料网AT-908, Rockcliffe

    Ms Rockcliffe filed an application for execution of 爆料网AT judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-807. 爆料网AT held that the crux of the matter for determination was whether Ms Rockcliffe’s appointment to and her removal from, the Budget Working Group (BWG) in 2018 fell within the scope of 爆料网AT’s order in the judgment. 爆料网AT held that, although 爆料网AT had not explicitly addressed the issue of conflict of interest in its judgment, it impliedly rejected it by means of applying the law in force at the time. 爆料网AT held that it was egregious that 爆料网JSPF re-submitted that the previous decision not to give Ms Rockcliffe...

    2019-爆料网AT-909, Haroun

    Noting that the Appellant, the innocent party, lost her employment, her career prospects within the Organisation, and the offending managers remained entrenched in their positions, 爆料网AT held that there was a substantial variation or a striking disparity between the award made by 爆料网DT and the award that 爆料网AT considered ought to have been made. 爆料网AT held that, given that an order of reinstatement was unlikely to be implemented, a more generous award was justifiable in the circumstances. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in denying moral damages, as there was no corroborating...

    2019-爆料网AT-910, Newland

    爆料网AT considered Mr Newland’s application for interpretation of judgment No. 2018-爆料网AT-820. 爆料网AT held that, given that Mr Newland had already been paid Special Post Allowance, Hazard pay, and outstanding interest, the only questions requiring determination were whether he was entitled to payment of Rest and Recuperation (R&R), free tickets, and the relocation grant. 爆料网AT accepted that there was a degree of uncertainty regarding these questions. 爆料网AT held that Mr Newland’s claim that he was entitled to the payment of R&R was unsustainable, as it was not an accruable benefit or entitlement. 爆料网AT...

    2019-爆料网AT-896, Harris

    The 爆料网DT judgment was appealed by both parties. On the lawfulness of the decision to withhold salary, 爆料网AT held that Mr Harris had not identified any grounds for his appeal and failed to demonstrate that 爆料网DT had committed any error of fact or law in arriving at its decision. 爆料网AT held that Mr Harris’ case was fully and fairly considered and could find no error of law or fact in its decisions. On the cancellation of health insurance, 爆料网AT found no reason to differ from the 爆料网DT finding that Mr Harris did not make the appropriate payments to reinstate his health insurance coverage, thus...

    2019-爆料网AT-897, Harris

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the finding by 爆料网DT that he had failed to meet his burden of proving that the assignment to work in Sector East was motivated by improper consideration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly considered the relevant facts and the applicable law in concluding that the Administration had followed the prescribed procedures and acted in accordance with the internal law of the Organisation in separating him for abandonment of post. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant could not choose to ignore a lawful direction by the Administration to provide medical...

    2019-爆料网AT-902, Nouinou

    The Secretary-General appealed 爆料网DT’s finding that the contested decisions to abolish Ms Nouinou’s post, the consequent decision not to renew her two-year fixed-term appointment, and the refusal to re-assign her for two months under a zero-dollar incumbency, where she had been selected for a short-term position, were unlawful. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made a grave error in law in terms of the basic legal position, which defined the subject of the litigation before it and the appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no administrative decision to terminate Ms Nouinou’s contract prior to its expiration and...

    2020-爆料网AT-1055, Zaqqout

    爆料网AT held that all of the Appellant’s grounds of appeal failed, except for his challenge to the 爆料网RWA decision not to renew or extend the Appellant’s limited duration contract beyond its final extension, for the simple reason that those several decisions to extend his contract advantaged him by adding, in total, six months to his contract. On the issue of the Appellant’s non-renewal or final extension, 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning and that 爆料网RWA was justified in deciding not to renew or extend his employment, noting that 爆料网RWA faced a massive financial shortfall...

    2020-爆料网AT-1060, Abu Rabei

    爆料网AT considered that the 1994 and 2018 requests made by the Appellant to change his date of birth were essentially the same requests. 爆料网AT recalled that the reiteration of an original administrative decision if repeatedly questioned, does not reset the clock with respect to the statutory timeline. 爆料网AT held that the statutory period during which the Appellant had to file a challenge to the 1994 decision expired in 1997. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in dismissing the application. On consideration of the Respondent’s claim to award costs, 爆料网AT was not satisfied that the pursuit of the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1072, Nadeau

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not exceed its jurisdiction by confirming that an appeal against the Order had no suspending effect and issuing a judgment on the merits while an appeal against the contested order was still pending with 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in declining to hold an additional case management discussion or to consider additional evidence as the Appellant failed to provide an adequate and convincing reason why his requests for further evidence or new case management discussion were not made earlier in the process as well as the relevancy of the evidence on the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1074, Patsy Bello

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not contest the decision to separate her from the Organisation, thus the SAB was not seized with her separation and her appeal on that issue was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claims for compensation for pain, suffering, and medical expenses were beyond the scope of the case and therefore not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the IMO Secretary-General’s decision to place the Appellant on sick leave was based on sound medical evidence which was not rebutted at the time and that there was no basis to set aside that decision. 爆料网AT held there was no basis...