爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 661 - 670 of 1006
    2019-爆料网AT-976, Ganbold

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed various errors of law, fact, and procedure. 爆料网AT held that the whole reasoning of 爆料网DT was misconstrued and 爆料网DT did not properly examine the lawfulness of the disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant awarded and signed a contract on behalf of 爆料网FPA, that she did not conduct any market research or consider other suppliers before doing so, that she had no authority to sign the contract and that she was involved in procurement activities in relation to another 爆料网FPA vendor. Further, 爆料网AT held that there was...

    2019-爆料网AT-948, Sonia Bezziccheri

    As a preliminary matter, in response to the Appellant’s request for interim measures, in which she requested that the Secretary-General complied with the 爆料网DT judgment insofar as it had not been appealed against, 爆料网AT denied the motion on the basis that execution should have been requested before 爆料网DT. On the Appellant’s motion to strike assertions and evidence, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was supplementing her appeal, and denied the motion. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the appeal was limited to the request for further compensation, as per the Appellant’s Power of Attorney document, and...

    2019-爆料网AT-932, Kinyanjui

    爆料网AT held that the Administration was not under an obligation to pursue a recruitment procedure once begun by filling the post. 爆料网AT held that the contested administrative decision not to carry the recruitment process through to appointment, but rather to readvertise, was a valid and lawful exercise of the Administration’s discretion, based on sound reasons inextricably linked to the interest of the service, namely the situation in Burundi, the need for additional skills, and compliance with the relevant legal instruments governing the recruitment procedure. 爆料网AT held that the contested...

    2019-爆料网AT-934, Kauf

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law and fact when it concluded that the Administration, having issued the offer of appointment on the basis of a factual error to an ineligible candidate who was legally barred from being recruited, had a duty to withdraw the offer, as soon as the mistake was discovered; and that the Administration was legally precluded from issuing a letter of appointment to the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that, on the basis that it had concluded that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law and fact, it was unnecessary to examine the other grounds of appeal advanced by the...

    2019-爆料网AT-935, Jenbere

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was entirely without merit. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to find that the facts supporting the disciplinary measure had been established and to conclude that those facts amounted to misconduct. 爆料网AT supported the reasoning of 爆料网DT in rejecting the Appellant’s attempts at exoneration, namely that factors such as whether or not her husband was qualified for the job or the other candidate secured another position did not change the existence of a conflict of interest and the way in which the integrity of the process was compromised. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found...

    2019-爆料网AT-937, Alhawi

    爆料网AT held that while the 爆料网RWA DT decision could have had an indirect impact on the Appellant’s terms of appointment or contract, a direct effect is needed in order to allow a staff member to contest an adverse administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that the fact that 爆料网RWA granted the change of modality of contract to the other individual did not have any bearing on the outcome of the 爆料网RWA DT decision, because the application was dismissed on receivability grounds. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in any of its factual findings resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that...

    2019-爆料网AT-938, Alhawi

    Noting that the position in question remained vacant, 爆料网AT held that the decision to leave the position vacant was an exercise of the discretionary authority of 爆料网RWA DT and that there was no procedural irregularity or error of law within the exercise of that discretion. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the required burden to be heard on appeal, namely, he failed to identify any of the prescribed grounds of appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was estopped from raising new arguments on appeal with respect to priority consideration and facts on enrolment which were not argued before...

    2019-爆料网AT-939, Delaunay

    爆料网AT held that the ICJ had breached its duty to protect the staff member against harassment by another staff member. 爆料网AT held that, once senior management had become aware of the incidents, it should have envisaged that similar incidents could happen in the future, and it failed to take the appropriate measures to protect its staff. 爆料网AT awarded USD 12,500 to compensate the staff member for the harm suffered, and especially the harm to her reputation during the course of the investigations. 爆料网AT also awarded 3,630 Euros in legal fees.

    2019-爆料网AT-928, Abdellaoui

    爆料网AT held that the decision not to short-list the Appellant was an internal step within the selection process and not an administrative decision and that 爆料网DT should have only received her application against the selection decision whilst the decision not to short-list the Appellant is examined as a part of the final non-selection decision. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was defective as the Appellant did not clearly define the grounds of appeal as required under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute, however it considered the appeal on the basis that the Appellant was self-represented. 爆料网AT rejected...

    2019-爆料网AT-922, Haq and Kane

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On receivability, 爆料网AT opined that it doubted whether the application was receivable, but due to some uncertainties and because the matter was of general interest, it would decide the case on the merits. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that Ms Haq and Ms Kane had a fundamental right to be fully and accurately informed about their pension entitlements at the time of their appointments. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in failing to consider that Staff Regulation 4. 1 does not oblige the Secretary-General to transmit...