爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 591 - 600 of 1006
    2017-爆料网AT-766, Alsado

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Alsado due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Alsado’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-767, Wright

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Wright’s permanent appointment was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Wright’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-761, Michaud

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s motion to adduce additional evidence in the form of an affidavit by him for the absence of exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the Office of Audit and Investigation Services (OAIS) took no decision that materially, adversely, or directly impacted the rights of the Appellant and that it merely made a non-binding recommendation to 爆料网DP. 爆料网AT held that the recommendation by OAIS was not an administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that the appeal in relation to the investigation was not receivable ratione materiae...

    2018-爆料网AT-868, Sarwar

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in reopening a matter that had already been the subject of a final judgment of 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT considered that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by making its own determination of Mr Sarwar’s harassment complaint, emphasising that the role of the Tribunal is not to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it rescinded the contested decision to close the matter underlying the Appellant’s formal complaint, and when it ruled that there was no need for a new...

    2018-爆料网AT-882, Rehman

    The Appellant sought an order for reinstatement, an increase in the compensation awarded, and an increase in the amount awarded by 爆料网DT for moral damages. The Appellant also contested the failure 爆料网DT’s failure to make a referral for accountability to the Secretary-General under Article 10(8) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT decided that Article 10(5)(a) of the 爆料网DT Statute, which corresponds to Article 9 (1)(a) of the 爆料网AT Statute, does not confer on the Tribunal the power to enforce the reinstatement of a staff member’s contract in a non-renewal case. 爆料网AT, therefore, held that the Appellant’s...

    2018-爆料网AT-893, Elzarov

    爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that the Secretary-General acted in an arbitrary, discriminatory, or irregular manner. 爆料网AT held that accounting for factors such as 爆料网AMID’s scorecard with respect to gender targets and the selected candidate’s proficiency in Arabic did not amount to discrimination and that it was in the Secretary-General’s discretion to do so. 爆料网AT held that no evidence had been presented to it by the Appellant to support the contention that his application was not given full and fair consideration. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was unable to show through clear and...

    2018-爆料网AT-894, B. Kosbeh et al.

    Having decided that an oral hearing would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case,” as required by Article 18(1) of the RoP, 爆料网AT denied the Applicants’ request for one. 爆料网AT also decided that the Appellants could not introduce additional evidence since that evidence had not been presented before 爆料网RWA DT and no application had been made to 爆料网AT to be allowed to submit that evidence on appeal. 爆料网AT noted that an appeal is not receivable where an Applicant bypassed the jurisdiction of the first instance Judge, by directly lodging an appeal with the Appeals Tribunal against...

    2018-爆料网AT-887, Elayyan

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s Motion for Leave to Submit Additional Evidence, his appeal, and the Commissioner-General's cross-appeal. 爆料网AT found that the Applicant did not demonstrate any exceptional circumstances that would justify the filing of any additional documentary evidence and denied his motion. 爆料网AT held that the claim in Appellant’s Appeal was not initially brought before 爆料网RWA DT and could not be introduced for the first time before 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that the Commissioner-General's cross-appeal was entirely without merit and that 爆料网RWA DT was correct to find that the irregularity...

    2018-爆料网AT-888, Al Saleh

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing and claims for moral damages and reinstatement. 爆料网AT held that the factual and legal issues arising from the appeal have already been clearly defined by the parties and did not find that an oral hearing would “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. ” To that end, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT found no fault with 爆料网RWA DT’s conclusion that it was highly probable that the Appellant had a leadership role in the armed clashes of 18 June 2015. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence to suggest...

    2018-爆料网AT-889, Sall

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of the Appellant and the cross-appeal of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, noting that it would not have added any further value or clarification of the factual and legal issues. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General's cross-appeal was receivable, according to Article 9(4) of the RoP. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in holding that the disciplinary investigation was flawed by procedural irregularities. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the disciplinary decision was unlawful and, accordingly, that there could neither...