爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 581 - 590 of 1006
    2017-爆料网AT-723, Chhikara

    As a preliminary issue, Mr Chhikara brought a motion seeking leave to adduce additional evidence in the form of an affidavit setting out his credentials for the post and credentials of the selected candidate, claiming that he was not aware that this information was relevant at the time he made his initial submissions. 爆料网AT refused this motion on the basis that no exceptional circumstances were demonstrated and that Mr Chhikara’s explanation that he only realized the relevance of additional evidence after the 爆料网DT decision did not escape the fact that it was known to him at the time. As another...

    2017-爆料网AT-724, Mihai

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that although 爆料网DT did not expressly rescind the impugned decision to withdraw the offer of appointment, the award of compensation in lieu of rescission could be read as an implied order of rescission. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT gave no reasoning for the calculation of compensation, nor did it specify what amount corresponded to in-lieu compensation and what amount as compensation for loss of opportunity. 爆料网AT awarded three months’ net base salary as compensation in lieu of rescission of the impugned decision to withdraw the offer of...

    2017-爆料网AT-716, Cohen

    爆料网AT considered an application to 爆料网AT contesting the Conciliation Committee’s decision to recommend compensation of USD 35,000. 爆料网AT dismissed the motion of Ms Cohen seeking reconsideration of a 爆料网AT Order granting the ICJ Registrar additional time to file his answer. On Ms Cohen’s application for permission to reply to the ICJ Registrar’s answer on the grounds that neither the ICJ Registrar nor the Conciliation Committee addressed the testimony on record in their decisions, 爆料网AT considered that exceptional circumstances existed and granted the motion. 爆料网AT held that, absent a successful...

    2017-爆料网AT-744, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that the eleven new grounds of appeal raised by the Appellant for the first time on appeal were not receivable. They were for the most part alleged minor procedural defects that in all probability if proven, would have minimal, if any, impact on the fair and full consideration received by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that the reasoning of 爆料网DT was sound and unassailable, that it correctly determined the issues and dismissed the Appellant’s grounds of review for sustainable reasons. 爆料网AT held that it was unable to identify any...

    2017-爆料网AT-711, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT held that the appellant did not identify the alleged defects in the judgment and state the grounds relied upon in asserting that the judgment was defective. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely reiterated allegations already thoroughly examined by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the 爆料网DT findings such as to warrant its reversal. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2017-爆料网AT-712, Krioutchkov

    On the amount of compensation in lieu of rescission, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly applied Article 10(5) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that there was no fault with the 爆料网DT’s award of compensation of USD 2,000, noting that 爆料网DT considered the chances of success as well as the difference of net base salary between the one Mr. Krioutchkov received at his current grade and step and his potential income as of the relevant date, limited the projection of the difference in salary to two years. 爆料网AT held that absent any error of law or manifestly unreasonable factual findings 爆料网AT would not...

    2017-爆料网AT-742, Kallon

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal by a full bench of 爆料网AT. The majority of the judges upheld 爆料网DT’s findings that the contested decisions were substantively and procedurally flawed and dismissed the appeal. As for 爆料网DT’s moral damages award, the majority noted that the purpose of the amendment to Article 10. 5(b) of the 爆料网DT Statute, made following General Assembly Resolution 69/203, was to introduce an express requirement that compensation for harm can be awarded only when there is a sufficient evidentiary basis. The majority held that evidence of moral injury consisting...

    2017-爆料网AT-743, Jean

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT committed an error of law. 爆料网AT held that the record did not support the finding that the Appellant was notified for the purposes of Staff Rule 11.2(c) during her June 2014 meetings (or any previous ones) with the effect of triggering the time limits thereunder for her request for management evaluation. 爆料网AT noted that the minutes upon which 爆料网DT based its finding were unsigned, undated, and not shared with the Appellant at the time. 爆料网AT noted that the meetings of June 2014 did not have the aim of notification of the administrative decision of the non-renewal of her...

    2017-爆料网AT-763, Crotty

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr. Crotty due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr. Crotty’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...