爆料网AT considered an interlocutory appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not “clearly exceed its competence or jurisdiction” when it temporarily suspended the administrative decision to laterally reassign the staff member as that decision did not constitute a case of “appointment, promotion, or termination” excluded from interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the 爆料网DT Statute. Accordingly, 爆料网AT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable.
爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing and production of documents, to substantiate his claims of bias and discrimination against him, finding that a complaint of bias and discrimination was not receivable as it consisted of a series of past issues in respect of which he should have sought redress at the appropriate time. 爆料网AT stressed that it was not the task of the JAB or 爆料网AT to conduct a fresh investigation. 爆料网AT rejected the motion for submission of additional documentation, finding no need for further evidence pursuant to Article 10. 1 of the 爆料网AT RoP and no...
爆料网AT found that the execution of the 爆料网DT judgment No. 爆料网DT/2014/007 had been suspended following the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT judgment had become duly executable upon the issuing to the parties of judgment No. 2015-爆料网AT-516 wherein 爆料网AT dismissed the Secretary-General’s appeal against 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s motion seeking execution was properly filed before 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that the request for execution had been rendered moot by the event that the payment was issued on 22 July 2015. 爆料网AT considered that the only...
爆料网AT held that the Appellants had failed to present any evidence showing that they had suffered mental distress during the investigation, and such evidence was necessary for an award of moral damages. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in not awarding them compensation for the lengthy administrative delay during the investigation. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.
爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding that the appeal had been clearly defined and that there was no need for further clarification. 爆料网AT rejected the motion to file additional pleadings and additional evidence since the Appellant had failed to demonstrate any existence of exceptional circumstances that justified the need to file additional pleadings or to submit additional evidence. 爆料网AT held that the motion only presented factual and legal contentions that reiterated arguments made in the appeal brief. 爆料网AT further held that the Appellant had failed in his grounds of appeal...
爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding that the factual and legal issues arising from the appeal had already been clearly defined by the parties and there was no need for further clarification. 爆料网AT rejected the motion to file additional pleadings and evidence since the Appellant had failed to demonstrate the existence of any exceptional circumstances that justified the need to file additional pleadings or to submit additional evidence. 爆料网AT held that the motion only presented factual and legal contentions that reiterated arguments made in the appeal brief. 爆料网AT further held...
爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s request for leave to submit new evidence since the Secretary-General had the opportunity to present the evidence before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT further rejected the staff member’s requests in response and to conduct an oral hearing finding that the appealed issues had been adequately clarified. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erroneously substituted itself for the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s findings were supported by evidence and would, therefore, not interfere with the determination as to the existence of...
爆料网AT rejected the request for anonymity finding that there were no exceptional circumstances that could warrant departing from the general principles and from the well-established jurisprudence. 爆料网AT held that the theoretical fear of upcoming uncomfortable relationships between members of the staff did not have merit. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request to file a reply to the Respondent’s answer finding no exceptional circumstances justifying an additional pleading. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s second motion seeking leave to present additional “information” which she claimed related to...
爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not address any error of fact or law in the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that the irregularities in the procedure did not amount to a breach of the Appellant’s due process rights. 爆料网AT held that it was irrelevant whether the Appellant filed his application before 爆料网DT in the interests of justice or seeking an award of moral damages since there was no evidence of damages. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing and the production of documents since there was no need for further clarification. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s contentions regarding the application of the Palestinian Labour Law No. 7 (2000) and the 爆料网RWA DT’s error in calculating the time limits were misconceived. 爆料网AT held that, regarding the procedure and timeline involved in challenging administrative decisions, former 爆料网WRA Area Staff Rule 111. 3, which was in effect at the material time when the Appellant’s contract as a teacher was terminated, was applicable. 爆料网AT agreed with the...
