爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 481 - 490 of 1006
    2015-爆料网AT-563, Reid

    爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was not bringing a claim that he did not receive the benefits and entitlements which pertained to a temporary appointment, but rather his allegation was that the General Assembly resolutions which gave rise to the rules and administrative issuances regulating his employment did not adhere to the principle of equal pay for equal work and were contrary to a myriad of international human rights instruments to which the Organisation was bound to adhere. 爆料网AT held that the policy change for staff members on temporary contracts was binding on the Secretary-General, who...

    2015-爆料网AT-573, Walden

    爆料网AT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-436 as well as a motion requesting that 爆料网AT strike certain paragraphs from it. 爆料网AT held that the request did not fulfil the statutory requirements and constituted, in fact, a disguised attempt to re-open the case. 爆料网AT held that his application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.

    2015-爆料网AT-557, Kazazi

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application for confidentiality. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s contention that the Senior Human Resources Officer did not have the appropriate authority to take the contested decision and that such power lay only with the Director of Administration. 爆料网AT held, in agreement with 爆料网DT, that the e-mail from the Senior Human Resources Officer conveyed a clear and definite administrative decision with direct legal consequences for the Appellant. 爆料网AT held, in agreement with 爆料网DT, that the subsequent response from the Director of Administration...

    2015-爆料网AT-550, Mizyed

    爆料网AT held that the evidence against the Appellant uncovered by the investigation was so overwhelming that the only reasonable conclusion available to 爆料网DT was that the facts were established by clear and convincing evidence. Noting that the evidence that he was in possession of the stolen card and that he used it to refuel his own private vehicle was not contested by the Appellant, 爆料网AT held that his explanation of how he came into possession of the stolen card and how he came to use it was incapable of belief. 爆料网AT agreed with the finding of 爆料网DT that the established facts amounted to serious...

    2015-爆料网AT-552, Gallo

    爆料网AT held that it could discern no error in 爆料网DT’s computation of the applicable time limits. 爆料网AT considered that the 爆料网DT decision that it had no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Appellant’s claim was reasonable and there were no grounds for overturning it. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2015-爆料网AT-554, Chaaban

    爆料网AT had before it an appeal of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/017. 爆料网AT noted that judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-963 was a final judgment and therefore the Appellant’s case was res judicata, which meant that the Appellant was precluded from raising his claim again. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT made no error in finding the Appellant’s application manifestly inadmissible and dismissing it without referring it to the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held as unsustainable the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law when it considered his application was an application against judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-363. 爆料网AT held...

    2015-爆料网AT-553, Dia

    Noting that that the crux of the Appellant’s appeal was that 爆料网DT erred in failing to award him moral damages by reason of the violation of his right to a fair recruitment process and a missed opportunity, 爆料网AT held there was merit to the appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that the Appellant’s claim for moral damages was properly considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that on the totality of the evidence, the Appellant had a claim for moral damages. 爆料网AT upheld 爆料网DT’s finding that the recruitment process was flawed in that it was affected by the perception of bias. 爆料网AT granted the appeal in...

    2015-爆料网AT-547, Staedtler

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and committed an error in procedure, subjecting the parties to disparate treatment, lacked merit. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate what document or related facts he would have submitted that would have affected the outcome of the case if he had been given more time. Recalling the broad discretion of 爆料网DT to determine admissibility and weighing of evidence, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the Appellant’s submission that 爆料网DT erred in law and fact when it failed to draw the necessary inference from...

    2015-爆料网AT-546, Staedtler

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not establish any procedural errors warranting the reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence of any adverse administrative decision that stemmed from the Appellant’s performance appraisal and that the comments of his Second Reporting Officer (SRO) reflected no more than a legitimate exercise of administrative hierarchy evaluating employees, and did not of itself constitute an independent, administrative decision capable of being appealed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the Appellant’s challenge which related to the comments of...

    2015-爆料网AT-533, Onana

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the separation issue was not receivable because it was res judicata. On the non-selection issue, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to establish that 爆料网DT committed any errors of law or fact in reaching its finding that since the Appellant was unsuitable for the post, neither the failure to consider his application prior to the 30-day candidates nor the failure to notify him within 14 days of the selection decision vitiated the outcome of the selection process. 爆料网AT held that his requests for relief were denied, noting that where an irregularity has no...