爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 291 - 300 of 1006
    2022-爆料网AT-1191, Abdalla Abdalla

    Mr. Abdalla filed an application for revision and interpretation of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1078, claiming that the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal had a suspensive effect on the ongoing proceedings in the 爆料网DT, that therefore the extended time limit to file an application would not have elapsed, and thus his ultimate application should be received; and that once 爆料网AT had dismissed the Secretary-General's appeal, it should have remanded the case for further adjudication. 爆料网AT found that Mr. Abdalla had failed to point to any statement or consideration in the 爆料网AT Judgment which would...

    2022-爆料网AT-1266, Korkut Yavuz

    The only issue on appeal is whether the 爆料网DT judgment’s orders on in-lieu compensation and compensation for moral harm are free of error. In the present case, the 爆料网DT took into account the specific circumstances of the case, in particular the seniority of Mr. Yavuz, the type of appointment held, and the chance of renewal of the appointment in a position still required by the Administration and set an in-lieu compensation of three months. Mr. Yavuz complains that the 爆料网DT should also have considered the nature of the irregularity and the seriousness of the breaches of his rights and the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1265, Faraj El-Awar

    The 爆料网DT found the non-renewal decision unlawful because the Secretary-General did not show that it was motivated by a lack of funds. Although the 爆料网DT committed several errors of law, its main finding is not put into doubt by the Secretary-General’s appeal. Therefore, in this respect, the Secretary-General’s appeal cannot succeed. 爆料网DT's finding that 爆料网-Habitat silently accepted Mr. El-Awar's condition of reassignment is erroneous. A reassignment is an administrative decision, a unilateral act imposed on the staff member by the Administration. It is not a contract which can be bargained or...

    2022-爆料网AT-1264, AAC

    The essential question for determination on appeal is whether the 爆料网DT correctly held that the alleged misconduct of creating a hostile work environment and giving of gifts was proved in accordance with the standard of clear and convincing evidence. In other words, did the evidence establish the alleged misconduct to a high degree of probability? At its essence, therefore, this case involves strongly contested disputes of fact about whether AAC conducted himself in a manner that was abusive and created a hostile working environment. The Administration says he did. AAC strongly denies it. Thus...

    2022-爆料网AT-1262, Egor Ovcharenko et al., Danield Edward Kutner et al.

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals of two staff members who were not a party to the proceedings before the 爆料网DT and had no standing. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that there was a reviewable administrative decision within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred finding that the announcement by the USG/DGACM dated 8 April 2021 that the daily workload of translators would be increased to 5.8 pages and of self-revisers to 6.4 pages, was not an appealable administrative decision for the purpose of Article 2(1) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held...

    2022-爆料网AT-1259, Maguy Bamba

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before 爆料网DT regarding the evidence. 爆料网AT accepted 爆料网DT’s finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to establish the facts underlying the allegations of misconduct. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT applied the appropriate legal standard, namely clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT heard the evidence of the complainant, other material witnesses, assessed the credibility and reliability of the testimony under oath before it, determined the probable facts and then rendered a decision as to whether the onus to establish the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1257, Alex Lucchini

    Mr. Lucchini and the Secretary-General disagreed on whether 爆料网AT confirmed the 爆料网DT’s award of compensation for moral damages, in addition to increasing the amount of in lieu compensation from 10 months to 24 months, or ordered payment of the increased amount of compensation in lieu (of two years’ net base salary) but did not include the original award of compensation for moral harm that had been ordered by the 爆料网DT. Mr. Lucchini filed an application for interpretation seeking confirmation of his view that 爆料网AT’s ruling increased the amount of in lieu compensation from 10 to 24 months’ net...

    2022-爆料网AT-1255, Boubacar Dieng

    The Secretary-General sought interpretation, revision, and execution of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1118, on grounds that he was unable to effectuate the compensation awarded in the 爆料网DT Judgment because Mr. Dieng refused to provide his banking details. 爆料网AT held that the Judgment was clear, written in plain and unambiguous language, and it left no reasonable doubt as to what it meant. Thus, there was no need for clarification. 爆料网AT further found that the Secretary-General had failed to argue that he had discovered a decisive fact which was unknown to the Appeals Tribunal at the time the Judgment...

    2022-爆料网AT-1250, Giuseppe Belsito

    爆料网AT held that the undisputed breach of confidentiality in the selection process provided rational grounds for the cancellation decision. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the Appellant had access to information about his test score and that he was perhaps seeking to influence the decision through the hiring manager, rendered the selection exercise problematic and unsatisfactory. 爆料网AT held that the perception was unavoidably created that the Appellant was inappropriately favoured with access to information about a decision concerning his interests and in respect of which he enjoyed no authority...

    2022-爆料网AT-1249, Asr Toson

    Request for oral hearing: Given Mr. Toson’s arguments wherein he wishes to contest evidence before the Dispute Tribunal in a manner that would be essentially a rehearing of the evidence, 爆料网AT held that an oral hearing should not be granted and would not assist in expeditiously and fairly resolving the issues in this appeal. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the Dispute Tribunal applied the appropriate standard of review. It reviewed the applicable policy of the 爆料网FPA for selection processes (the PPM), reviewed the evidence, and determined that the applicable procedures were followed in the...