爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 261 - 270 of 1006
    2023-爆料网AT-1340, Mubashara Iram

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not erred in holding that there had been clear and convincing evidence that the staff member harassed other staff members over a substantial period of time, and that this behaviour constituted serious misconduct. The 爆料网AT affirmed that there was clear and convincing evidence to support the seven allegations that Ms. Iram used abusive language, made insulting remarks, shouted and bullied individuals, engaged in inappropriate touching, and made unwelcome contacts with individuals at their homes after working hours. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s due...

    2023-爆料网AT-1338, Jaime Rodolfo Minzer

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly pointed out that the only remedy requested by the staff member in his application to the 爆料网DT was the rescission of the administrative decision not to transfer him. Only now on appeal does the staff member raise other claims and additionally requests payment of all salaries and benefits from the date of termination to the date of the 爆料网AT Judgment, including pension benefits and compensation for the material and moral harm inflicted on him, caused by harassment, mistreatment, and unlawful termination. His new requests on appeal cannot be accepted by the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1337, Louis Savadogo

    The 爆料网AT affirmed the decision of the ITLOS JAB, holding that the ITLOS was not obliged to conclude the recruitment exercise once it had begun, and that it had the authority to cancel the process. The 爆料网AT was concerned by the change to the recruitment procedure during the course of the contested recruitment, but could not discern how this affected Mr. Savadogo’s candidacy. The 爆料网AT agreed with the ITLOS JAB that Mr. Savadogo’s allegations of bias against the Registrar in the recruitment were countered by the fact that the President of ITLOS made the significant decisions in the recruitment...

    2023-爆料网AT-1335, Vijay Neekhra

    The 爆料网AT found no errors in the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment and dismissed the appeal. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT correctly held that Mr. Neekhra’s due process rights were not violated by an undue delay in the investigation proceedings; that Mr. Neekhra’s actions to copy-paste excerpts from internal/external sources without proper citation was a violation of the Agency’s regulatory framework and constituted misconduct; and that the disciplinary measures of a written censure and deferment of eligibility for consideration for promotion were proportionate to the offense. The 爆料网AT dismissed the...

    2023-爆料网AT-1331, Osvaldo Di Mario

    爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing and held that it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case, as required by Article 18(1) of the 爆料网AT Rules of Procedure. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in striking the evidence filed with the Appellant’s closing submissions or in refusing to hear the Appellant’s supervisors as witnesses. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant used the 爆料网HCR VAT exemption card and credit card for his personal use and that the disciplinary measure was proportionate to the nature and gravity of...

    2023-爆料网AT-1330, Ray Steven Millan

    The 爆料网AT held that there was a preponderance of evidence that the staff member was a passenger in a clearly-marked 爆料网 vehicle in which acts of a sexual nature took place as it circulated in a heavily-trafficked area of the city. His conduct constituted an exceptional circumstance in terms of Section 11.4(b) of ST/AI/2017/1, especially considering the serious and grave nature of the conduct in which he was involved, captured on the video clip which was circulated widely, causing significant harm to the reputation and credibility of the Organization. His placement on ALWOP was a reasonable...

    2023-爆料网AT-1329, Claude Cahn

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact or exceed its jurisdiction and it dismissed the Secretary-General's appeal. The 爆料网AT found that the Administration had been made aware of the disharmonious working conditions within the Regional Office for Europe and had failed to take timely action. By exposing Mr. Cahn to harmful working conditions for a considerable amount of time (several months), the Administration failed in its duty of care vis-à-vis Mr. Cahn to timely implement preventive or interim measures and thus prevent any possible harm to his health, irrespective of whether...

    2022-爆料网AT-1307, ASR AHMED TOSON

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable on grounds that the 爆料网DT had not clearly exceeded its competence or jurisdiction or assumed a jurisdiction it did not have when it consolidated Mr. Toson's cases. The 爆料网AT also agreed with the Secretary-General that Mr. Toson had advanced similar unsuccessful arguments in an earlier 爆料网AT case that he brought, but Mr. Toson refused to be guided by that judgment prior to pursuing the present appeal. The 爆料网AT put Mr. Toson on notice that he risks incurring an award of costs for vexatious litigation if he persists in pursuing the same...

    2022-爆料网AT-1303, Dourrho Pierre

    Mr. Pierre filed an appeal. 爆料网AT found no error in the Dispute Tribunal's conclusion that the application was not receivable. The contested decision did not have legal consequences adversely affecting the terms and conditions of Mr. Pierre’s appointment and therefore, there was no appealable administrative decision. 爆料网AT was satisfied that the 爆料网DT correctly held that since Mr. Pierre had no expectancy of renewal of his fixed-term appointment, the short-term renewals were considered prima facie in his favour. 爆料网AT also found that Mr. Pierre had not provided sufficient evidence that the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1286, Raed Mousa

    Mr. Mousa appealed. As regards Mr. Mousa’s request for an oral hearing, the 爆料网AT held that he did not provide a compelling reason why an oral hearing should be granted in this appeal. As the case deals with the issue of receivability ratione materiae, an oral hearing is not necessary and would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case” within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the 爆料网AT’s Rules of Procedure. The 爆料网AT also found that Mr. Mousa’s appeal did not refer to any of the grounds of appeal mentioned in Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The only submission regarding the...