爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 21 - 30 of 1006
    2024-爆料网AT-1439, Egor Ovcharenko

    The Appeals Tribunal found that the proportional adjustment of workload standards for self-revision services was a matter that fell squarely within the Administration’s discretionary authority. The Appeals Tribunal was satisfied that the Administration followed all proper procedures when taking and implementing the contested decision, and the 爆料网DT properly determined that there was no requirement for staff management consultations at the departmental or office level in relation to a specific appealable administrative decision.

    The Appeals Tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed Judgment No...

    2024-爆料网AT-1430, Secretary-General of the United Nations

    The Appeals Tribunal granted the Secretary-General’s appeals, dismissed Mr. Heurtematte’s appeal and reversed the 爆料网DT Judgments.

    The Appeals Tribunal found that the 爆料网DT’s largely speculative grounds for concluding ulterior motives by 爆料网 Women were not justified, especially when compared to the compelling contemporaneous reasons for the abolition, i.e. the fact that 爆料网 Women no longer had a physical office in Panama, that the staff was working from home, and that the motor vehicles had been sold. The 爆料网DT went too far in reaching its own speculative conclusions why and how 爆料网 Women...

    2025-爆料网AT-1592, Deogracious Bwire Adundo

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s claims of fraudulent manipulation of his electronic leave records failed for want of proof.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网DT erred by leaving crucial factual issues unresolved, which made it impossible to determine the appeal fully. The 爆料网AT found that the tables summarizing the staff member’s sick leave records were not hearsay but qualified as business records entitled to a presumption of accuracy unless rebutted. However, the 爆料网AT was not satisfied that these records were accurate and noted unresolved inconsistencies. Accordingly, the 爆料网AT further...

    2025-爆料网AT-1613, Traian Turcanu

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that the contested decision to close the staff member’s complaint without investigation was lawful and reasonable. The 爆料网AT found that OIAI properly assessed the allegations and determined they lacked sufficient evidence or indicia of misconduct, and that the incidents described fell within normal performance management rather than harassment or abuse of authority.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网DT correctly found that disagreements over performance ratings and the implementation of a Performance Improvement Plan do not constitute...

    2025-爆料网AT-1615, Clay Shiala Nsilu

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member’s application before the 爆料网DT was not receivable ratione temporis. The 爆料网AT observed that the former staff member was notified of the contested decision on 30 May 2024 or, according to his own statement, no later than 5 June 2024. Accordingly, in the first scenario, the application should have been filed by 28 August 2024, and in the second scenario, by 3 September 2024. As his application was filed only on 4 September 2024, the 爆料网AT concluded that it had been correctly found to have been submitted well outside the statutory 90-day time limit.

    The...

    2025-爆料网AT-1603, Giovanni Ardito, David Pusztai

    The 爆料网AT noted that the JAB is specifically empowered to rule on a request for suspension of action which is within its jurisdiction and competence, so there was no basis for the 爆料网AT to consider the appeals unless and until there is a timely application from a decision on the merits. At such time, the 爆料网AT may consider, if appropriate, the due process issues raised in the currently appeal by the former ISA staff members.

    The 爆料网AT noted that oral hearings would not assist the Tribunal with the fair and expeditious disposition of the case as there is no justification to hold oral hearings when...

    2025-爆料网AT-1582, Olexandr Maruschak

    The 爆料网AT observed that there may have been some ambiguity in paragraph 104 of the 爆料网AT Judgment for which the Secretary-General requested interpretation. The 爆料网AT held that the appropriate interpretation was that when the 爆料网DT renders its new decision on Article 10(5) and 10(6) of the 爆料网DT Statute, then the non-prevailing party may appeal the new 爆料网DT judgment in its entirety, including the 爆料网DT’s holding on the merits.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Secretary-General’s application for interpretation is admissible and granted. It further noted that once the 爆料网DT fully exercises its jurisdiction on...

    2025-爆料网AT-1602, Hatim Mahmoud Sobier

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in finding the staff member’s challenge to the non?installation of dependents receivable because the request for management evaluation was filed outside the mandatory 60?day deadline under Staff Rule 11.2(c). The 爆料网AT found that Article 8(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute prohibits waiving or suspending this deadline and that the 爆料网DT acted beyond its jurisdiction by deciding that the Administration had waived the timeliness argument.

    The 爆料网AT further held that the 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that the denial of the optional reduced non?family service allowance was...

    2025-爆料网AT-1599, Faten Hatem Al Dawoud

    The 爆料网AT held that the appeal was timely, as Article 11(5) of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute provides that the filing period begins upon receipt of the Arabic translation of the judgment when the application was originally submitted in Arabic. Since Ms. Al Dawoud received the Arabic version on 9 January 2025 and filed her appeal on 10 March 2025, the appeal was timely.

    On the merits, the 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网RWA DT correctly identified the Agency’s error in treating an email shared by Ms. Al Dawoud as confidential and acknowledged the harm caused by the erroneous disciplinary measure. However, the 爆料网AT...