爆料网

爆料网AT Statute

  • Article 1.2(c)
  • Article 10. 9
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.2(a)
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(a)
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9
  • Article 2.9(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 2(c)
  • Article 2(e)
  • Article 24
  • Article 3.2
  • Article 4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(a)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.5
  • Article 9(b)
    • Showing 171 - 180 of 1006
    2023-爆料网AT-1407, Lars Ronved

    Mr. Ronved appealed.

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment.

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in finding the application not receivable with respect to the refusal of a temporary promotion to the P-4 level.? The contested decision before the 爆料网DT was the decision to extend the SPA, which the Appellant timely challenged before the MEU and the 爆料网DT.? The extension of the SPA and the denial to grant a promotion were two sides of the same decision, with the same time limits for management evaluation.? Therefore, the request for management evaluation of both decisions was...

    2023-爆料网AT-1406, Kamal Karki

    The 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for anonymity as the issue presented in his appeal was purely procedural and jurisdictional and did not involve any personal data which had to be protected.

    The 爆料网AT also denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, finding that that it would not assist the Appeals Tribunal in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case.

    The 爆料网AT held that because the Appellant filed his application 93 days after the receipt of the contested administrative decision, it was not receivable, absent waiver of the deadline of the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT observed that given...

    2023-爆料网AT-1405, Yonas Negasa

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General.

    The 爆料网AT held that the administration of the written security affairs exam in the present case had not met the minimum standards detailed in Chhikara. The 爆料网AT noted that the Administration had first administered the test, analyzed the results, and only then had decided that certain questions should be eliminated from consideration. The 爆料网AT found that the unannounced and ex post deletion of questions from the written examination, after it had already been marked, on its very face violated the obligation to administer the test in a...

    2023-爆料网AT-1404 , Alan George Blythe

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member.

    The 爆料网AT found that the recommendation report did not provide any explanation to understand the rationale of the non-selection decision. The 爆料网AT noted that no information had been given in the course of the judicial proceedings either as to why the external candidate was the most suitable candidate. The 爆料网AT held that, for the sake of reasonableness, fairness and transparency, it was expected from the Administration to give relevant and true reasons supporting its ultimate choice. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT had made an error of fact...

    爆料网DT/2023/132, Naji

    The Tribunal finds that the Applicant is challenging an administrative decision that is alleged to be in non-compliance with his terms of appointment or his contract of employment and is not challenging the legitimacy of General Assembly resolution 66/234. The application is accordingly receivable.

    The General Assembly resolution, Staff Rules, and the ICSC principles and guidelines are clear and unambiguous. These rules stipulate that GS staff wishing to apply for a professional post must first pass the G to P exam unless exceptional approval for a waiver is granted.

    Staff at level FS-5 and...

    爆料网DT/2023/131, Sahyoun

    The application was filed without being preceded by a timely filing of a request for management evaluation and the subject matter complained of does not include an administrative decision. The Applicant did not seek management evaluation of the final non-selection decision, which was required to contest it. She only requested management evaluation of the decision not to invite her to a competency-based interview.

    The Applicant seeks to contest a preliminary step in a selection process, which can only be challenged in the context of a final selection decision. It is a premature contestation of...

    2023-爆料网AT-1402, Faten Hatim Al Dawoud

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member.

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning for refusing an oral hearing because the staff member failed to establish that her appeal was receivable, was ex post facto and, thereby, erroneous.

    The 爆料网AT found that there was an error in the 爆料网RWA DT’s calculation of compensation in lieu of rescission of the non-selection decision as there was no evidence to support the conclusion that the 爆料网RWA would have found her unsuitable for the role at the end of the probationary period.

    The 爆料网AT was of the view that the 爆料网RWA DT’s methodology of fixing...

    2023-爆料网AT-1401, Mo?se Alain Nkoyock (Fils)

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT made several errors of law and of fact leading to a manifestly unreasonable outcome.

    In particular, the 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT erred in refusing to hold a hearing of evidence that Mr. Nkoyock sought to call to establish his defence to the allegations against him and to impeach the Secretary-General’s witnesses. The 爆料网DT further erred when it failed to reach its own conclusions on disputed facts and relied overly on the internal investigation’s findings. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT also erred in relying on evidence that it had ruled irrelevant and inadmissible...

    2023-爆料网AT-1403, Francis N. Fultang

    The 爆料网AT held that the absence of a case management discussion and an oral hearing before the 爆料网DT was not a procedural error.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT did not err in admitting and considering the memorandum of allegations of misconduct, as it was used by the Administration only to verify that circumstances warranting the placement of the Appellant on ALWP occurred. The 爆料网AT also found that the OIOS Investigation Report did not refer to the communications between the Appellant and his counsel, nor to exchanges during a mediation process, but only considered the Appellant’s objective...

    2023-爆料网AT-1398, Sergio Baltazar Arvizú Trevino

    The 爆料网AT noted that several months after the Secretary-General had been notified of the Judgment, the only action taken was that some responses had been elicited from four staff members alleged in the complaint to have engaged in misconduct and that “these responses alongside the 22 pages and 18 annexes” to the complaint were under review.

    Noting the justification of the Secretary-General for the inaction that in the instant matter, no specific time had been set for execution, the 爆料网AT held that the Administration had not acted as promptly as per the obligations imposed on it, "within a...